Prices of things are becoming absolutely insane. $800+ rent, $30,000 cars, $10 sub sandwiches, etc. It would be nice to do a 3/1 split and cut everything by 2/3. Then we would have $266 rent, $10,000 cars, and $3.33 sub sandwiches. Wages, debts, everything would drop to 1/3 what they are now. It would also make coins useful again since a vending machine soda would be 2 quarters again.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      010 months ago

      Because numbers are becoming so large its almost pointless to think about. The national debt for example is 33 trillion dollars. That is an unimaginable sum. What even is 33 trillion dollars?

      • @HerrBeter
        link
        English
        1710 months ago

        Ah, my good sir, I believe that 33 trillion dollars is the equivalent of one current US national debt.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -210 months ago

          Yes, but a regular individual cannot even fathom 33 trillion dollars. It is a number so large that it’s not understandable.

          • ares35
            link
            fedilink
            110 months ago

            it’s nearly $100,000 per person (man, woman, child… everyone).

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        In Korea, 1000₩ is about $1 (USD).

        Your rent could be 200,000* units per month. So it’s basically a factor of 100, but for cents instead of dollars.

        Yet shopping was still a whole lot easier because if the price said 1000₩, you paid 1000₩, no questions asked. Unlike in the US, where your $1.00 coffee gets $0.10 added for tax, $0.25 added for the tip, so even though the menu says $1.00, the actual cost to the customer is $1.35.

        The problem isn’t that the numbers are big. The problem is that you’re trying to think about national numbers from the perspective of an individual.

        500 miles might not be far for a pilot, but it would be for a jogger. We don’t need to shorten the units to make it easier for the jogger to understand 500 miles. (0.5 kilomiles! Lol)

        *EDIT: Fixed the scale. I’ve been working with Japanese Yen which is a factor of 10, but KRW is a factor of 100 like I said…but mathed wrong. Lol

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          010 months ago

          Right, but I figure that making, say, the national debt, at least somewhat more understandable to the average individual, would, at least hopefully, make the average individual hold the government accountable for absolutely uncontrollable spending. as is people just don’t care because the numbers are so unfathomable that they are like fuck it

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            410 months ago

            I think this is a different issue than big numbers.

            I have zero mechanisms available to me to reign in national spending anyway. If the debt were $10 dollars, that’d still be the case. But even if I did, the national debt doesn’t affect me in the slightest, why should I care if it’s $10 or $10T?

            • @[email protected]OP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              210 months ago

              Fair. Eventually the us will enter a debt spiral and the average person will be living on the street eating 1 meal a day and shooting politicians for fucking everything up. However, just revaluing the currency does not solve that problem. That is a bigger, more systemic issue.

          • Urist
            link
            fedilink
            English
            210 months ago

            I’m not understanding….

            You do realize if you cut all dollar values to be 1/3 of the original value, the national debt becomes:

            33 trillion * 1/3 = 11 trillion

            This number is still unimaginably large, no?

            I really wouldn’t worry about the debt. All nations have debt, and I bet the USAs debit-to-gdp ratio isn’t that bad (been a while since I paid attention to those numbers though).

            • @[email protected]OP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              110 months ago

              I think I read somewhere that the debt to GDP ratio was something like 150% currently.

              • Urist
                link
                fedilink
                English
                110 months ago

                Sorry, I failed to finish my whole thought there.

                Debt to gdp ratio is probably pretty average in comparison to other nations (admittedly this is a figure I have not looked up in a while). The yardstick we should use to measure how bad our debts are should be other economies. Government debt is nothing like the debt of private citizens.

                • @[email protected]OP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  110 months ago

                  I haven’t looked up what other countries debt to GDP ratios are, but if they are similar, at say, 150% then won’t we just end up in a scenario where the entire world crashes and burns and the average citizens all over the world are put out onto the streets? To my knowledge, the crazy circus can’t go on forever.

                  • Urist
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    110 months ago

                    No, that only happens if countries stop being able to make good on their loans. To my knowledge most USA debt is owned by USA citizens and corporations in the form of bonds. Nations aren’t just loaning each ofher money they don’t have.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Is this a problem, though? There’s currencies like the Yen which have high numbers, the users just adjust their mindset of how much is “a lot”. Reducing the numbers wouldn’t change the problems of things getting more expensive. This feels like treating a very cosmetic symptom of a much larger problem.

        The wealthy would still possess an obscene and unfathomable amount of wealth and the impoverished would still be struggling to get by, just the numbers would be smaller. Does that help anything?

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          210 months ago

          Oh, I definitely see your point, and it is very much a psychological thing more than an actual fix.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Don’t get me wrong, I’d much rather be paying $266 in rent, though if I’m making one third of what I do now, I’m still in the same spot, just… with smaller numbers.

            • @[email protected]OP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Right, as I said, it is definitely more psychological than actually helpful, but it would definitely feel a lot better to see smaller numbers. Hell, the national debt is even hard to write. 33,000,000,000,000

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                2
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                But the national debt is irrelevant to me. It has zero impact on my day to day life. It’s just some imaginary number pundits can shout about to push their utterly disconnected agendas.

                Even if I could wrap my head around it, that wouldn’t improve the credit rating of the nation, even if I could manage to care one iota about that.

                I’m sorry, I’m just struggling to understand why it’s useful to have a national debt that’s a small enough number for me to visualize some quantification of it.

                • @[email protected]OP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  110 months ago

                  True, but as the national debt grows, everything else grows with it, and inflation, and eventually rent would be $10,000 a month.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    1
                    edit-2
                    10 months ago

                    Sorry, I don’t think I follow as to why that’s bad. If I pay, say, $1,000 in rent and earn $3,000 a month, it’s the same thing as if I paid $10,000 in rent and made $30,000 a month.

                    While I can see how those numbers could be reduced into smaller numbers easily, I’m not sure I understand why that is beneficial. My material conditions don’t change.

                    How does the national debt factor into that?

      • Ashy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        That is an unimaginable sum. What even is 33 trillion dollars?

        How is 11 trillion any better?

        If you want to actually bring that to a number people can grasp than small amounts would become impractically small. Like you would need to deal with 0.000001 and 0.0000001 dollars and stuff.