For the last two years, Koen has routinely self-administered weekly testosterone injections without a second thought.

During that time, the trans 17-year-old said his self-image and school and family life has drastically improved. His fear of needles, too, has faded.

“[Transitioning] made me look forward to things more because now I can start paying attention to the better version of myself,” said Koen, who asked to be identified by his first name because of fears for his safety. “It’s something I feel like I’ve needed for a while. I’m able to express myself more fluidly and feel comfortable doing that, which I think is a very big step for me right now.”

At the start of the year, though, a greater worry emerged.

A new law banning gender-affirming care for minors in Louisiana took effect on Jan. 1 prohibiting puberty blockers, hormone treatment, and gender-reaffirming surgery. Now, Koen isn’t sure he could continue his hormone treatment.

Louisiana is one of 22 other states that have enacted laws restricting or banning gender-affirming medical care for minors, disrupting health care needs for trans and nonbinary people.

  • @maness300
    link
    -414 months ago

    What exactly is “gender-affirming” care? Is it a sex change? Is it hormone therapy?

    Why can’t articles report on specifics instead of using loaded language?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loaded_language

    “This type of language is very often made vague to more effectively invoke an emotional response and/or exploit stereotypes.”

    Both sides do it, and we should feel shame whenever we stoop as low as /r/conservative.

    • @inb4_FoundTheVegan
      link
      434 months ago

      I think it’s sorta telling that you did a wiki search for loaded language instead of one for gender affirming care. To be clear, it’s absolutely not loaded language, it’s just language you don’t understand, literally anything can seem vague if you don’t know what it entails, if you truly don’t want to be like /conservative then I think you should be a but more proactive at self education.

      Here is a better rundown from a neutral source. But tldr it’d everything from parental support/respect for prounons/new haircut/clothes and possibly puberty blockers for minors. To hormones, electrolysis and an extremely long list of different surgical options too numerous to lost depending on the person.

      So the idea of blocking all medical options for minors is ridiculous since no minors are getting surgery. Period. And puberty blockers are both reversible and have been used for decades. Legislation restricting what psychologists, pediatricians and endocrinologists have all agreed as safe and effective treatment is just lunacy and bigotry.

      • prole
        link
        fedilink
        English
        114 months ago

        It’s also not just for trans kids. There are all sorts of types of gender affirming care that have nothing to do with transitioning.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      264 months ago

      Gender affirming care is professionally administered interventions that help a person live an affirmed life as the gender they most identify with.

      In practical terms, it’s a giant-ass flow chart with a bunch of different questions and options that end in a wide array of care options that properly guided individuals and either partake of, or not. Everything from talk therapy, to puberty blockers, to hormone replacement therapy, to physical surgeries on their genitals, to adding or removing breast mass, to changing the configuration of their face. Whatever makes sense to the individual.

    • prole
      link
      fedilink
      English
      154 months ago

      I didn’t read the article, and I refuse to do even the most basic research on this subject, but let me tell you (with undeserved confidence) why you’re wrong.

      • @blazeknave
        link
        24 months ago

        You have a hotkey for that around here?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      134 months ago

      Did you bother following any links in the article? They have a link to the bill, explaining exactly what they’re banning, as well as another explaining in detail what gender affirming care is.