• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    210 months ago

    Either watch ads or pay for Premium. Or don’t watch Youtube. Those are the three choices most people will have. And it’s Youtube’s right as a private platform to give them those choices.

    It’s worth it for me because I watch a lot of Youtube. In return, I don’t watch traditional TV, so I don’t pay for cable or similar things.

    • @Aganim
      link
      110 months ago

      Either watch ads or pay for Premium

      Unfortunately though it is ‘pay for Premium and still watch ads’. So many videos have the ads baked in by the content creators. Yes, you can manually seek forward, but that’s annoying and defeating the purpose of Premium. Especially for the price they ask in my country.

      Either watch ads or pay for Premium. Or don’t watch Youtube. Those are the three choices most people will have. And it’s Youtube’s right as a private platform to give them those choices.

      I fully agree, never suggested otherwise. But fortunately free speech allows us to have an opinion about a product.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        110 months ago

        I get what you’re saying, and yes, sponsored segments can be pretty annoying, even if it’s up to the creator how annoying they are. Either way, I just run SponsorBlock, so I can skip those segments with one click.

    • @micka190
      link
      -110 months ago

      Those are the three choices most people will have.

      LMAO

      You forgot the simplest of them: Firefox, uBlock Origins, SponsorBlock. Works on desktop and Android.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -210 months ago

        Homie missed the point. using ublock and sponsorblock is equal to petty theft. Disliking a company doesn’t make it morally right to steal from them.

        • @micka190
          link
          310 months ago

          You’re not going to guilt trip me out of adblocking Google of all fucking companies lmao

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -410 months ago

            No, I’m not here to defend Alphabet. I’m just saying it’s equal to stealing groceries at Wallmart. They request payment, you deny. Just because it’s so much easier to do on YouTube doesn’t mean it’s any more justifiable.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -310 months ago

            Oh baby, you don’t understand what you just said, do you?

            Nobody forces you to watch ads. Close YouTube, don’t look back, email content creators to have em send ad free video links directly to you.

            Watching ads is your obligation as consumer, if you decide not to pay for their removal.

            • 🐑🇸 🇭 🇪 🇪 🇵 🇱 🇪🐑
              link
              English
              1
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              It’s not my obligation and I’m never going to stop because controlling what appears on my screen, is my legal right ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗ

              If people decide to pay for something they have no legal obligation to because they got brainwashed, that only makes them suckers

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -210 months ago

        You mean the browsers that Google is throttling Youtube on, if they’re blocking ads? I use Firefox with SponsorBlock myself, but I’d say that most people are using either Chrome or Edge and would not switch to Firefox, despite of how much better it would be. Most people just like what they’re used to.

        • @micka190
          link
          210 months ago

          Man, you’re all over this thread sticking up to Google. You should apply there. They just laid off 100 YouTube employees. At least you’d be paid to shill.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            010 months ago

            Fuck off lol. I’m not sticking up for Google/Alphabet, they’re an untrustworthy company and as someone working in tech, I hate the trend of layoffs currently going on, all to make shareholders happy.

            I’m sticking up for people actually paying for the services they use. Streaming videos costs a shitton of money (servers, bandwith, platform maintenance, etc.) and Youtube has lost money for literal YEARS, which they are trying to fix. If Youtube went under for being too unprofitable, most creators on the platform would be out of a job. As long as there’s no proper competing platform, Youtube is the best we have.