The Biden administration is expected to soon announce plans to redesignate Iranian-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen as specially designated global terrorists, according to two people familiar with the White House decision and a U.S. official.

The move comes as the Houthis have launched dozens of attacks on commercial vessels in the Red Sea. The group says it has attacked the ships in response to Israel’s military operations in Gaza in the aftermath of Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack on Israel.

The three people familiar with the decision were not authorized to comment and requested anonymity to discuss the matter ahead of the expected formal announcement.

  • DarkGamer
    link
    fedilink
    -6
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    This conflict started before then, when Arab nationalists started murdering Jews for legally buying land nearby. They keep choosing violence and losing and their situation worsens, you’d think they’d learn by now.

    In 1948 they declared war on Israel, their forces partook in ethnic cleansing and genocide against Jews in Jerusalem and the west bank, and they lost the war, losing territory. They have refused to pacify themselves since then.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness
      link
      fedilink
      411 months ago

      Let’s set aside the truth of that statement because it frankly doesn’t matter. Palestinians have suffered ethnic cleansing, occupation and apartheid since 1949. Every one of these is an act of war that makes resistance, including using violence, perfectly legitimate.

      • @AA5B
        link
        111 months ago

        How do you separate half the issue? How can you believe such simplification really describes the situation? If it did, we could have solved it long ago, but the reality is a lot more complex with too much history of atrocities in all directions. If we want to do something about it, we need to start by recognizing the whole problem

        • NoneOfUrBusiness
          link
          fedilink
          -1
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          How can you believe such simplification really describes the situation?

          It describes the situation because no matter of Palestinian mob violence in Mandate Palestine justifies the Nakba. I could go on about how Arabs had no problem with pre-Zionism Aliyahs or actually look into it and see what the first instances of organized violence is, or explain how Zionist terrorists also attacked Arabs but like I said it doesn’t matter.

          Israel committed ethnic cleansing in 1949, and continues to do so today. There’s just nothing in the scale of Mandate Palestine that could’ve justified that.

      • DarkGamer
        link
        fedilink
        -3
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Even if it’s legitimate, it’s not viable, wars can’t be won by outrage alone. Massacring raping and kidnapping civilians on the other side will not achieve their stated goals, but it will make life worse for Palestinians. Palestine needs to acknowledge the reality of their situation.

        If they were to unconditionally surrender like Japan and Germany did, perhaps they would fare as well as those places do today. Violence will only lead to more violence.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness
          link
          fedilink
          -111 months ago

          If they were to unconditionally surrender like Japan and Germany did, perhaps they would fare as well as those places do today.

          No way. Germany and Japan are doing well today because the US wanted them to do well so they can be part of their bloc against the Soviet Union. Israel doesn’t want Palestinians to do well; it wants to erase them from the map. That’s what wanting to “settle” Palestine means.

          Do you want to see what happens when Palestinians unconditionally surrender? Look at the West Bank. There’s barely any resistance there, even after it intensified in the last few years. And the result? They’re the victims of a slow-burn genocide.

    • @Keeponstalin
      link
      -111 months ago

      The Zionist approach during the Mandate was to buy land from the big landlords and evict the tenants. The government hoped that a mass transfer of the tenants from Palestine could be organized, preferably as part of a general solution to the situation, but was prepared, in the short term, to put up with small evictions here and there. When the ‘mass transfer’ happened, in 1948, it affected Palestinians from almost all walks of life. In the meantime tenants were losing their land without any compensation or work elsewhere.26 The easiest course for the Zionists was to buy land from the most a-national of the notables, the absentee landlords, who during the Mandate owned more than 20 per cent of private land.27 The largest landowner in Palestine was Abdul Rahman Pasha, who lived in Damascus and owned 200,000 dunams (the richest of the local notables, such as the Husaynis in Jerusalem, owned just 50,000 dunams).

      • A History of Modern Palestine Page 146, Ilan Pappe

      Additional links

      https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2017/5/23/the-nakba-did-not-start-or-end-in-1948

      https://ismi.emory.edu/documents/stein-publications/website docs 2011-2004/website docs 2000 and earlier/JNF-Stein1984.pdf

      https://www.972mag.com/mapping-the-palestinian-villages-erased-and-replaced-with-jewish-towns/

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sursock_Purchases

      Israel was the state with plans for ethnic cleansing. And there is plenty of historians that disagree with your statement in light of released Israeli archives

      https://imeu.org/article/plan-dalet

      https://users.ox.ac.uk/~ssfc0005/The Debate About 1948.html

      https://merip.org/1998/06/fifty-years-through-the-eyes-of-new-historians-in-israel/