@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 1 year agoJust sayinmander.xyzimagemessage-square237fedilinkarrow-up12.49Karrow-down159
arrow-up12.43Karrow-down1imageJust sayinmander.xyz@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square237fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•1 year agoWhy? A co-op can own an apartment with occupants as co-owners. There’s no need for rent.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•1 year agoI ask again: why? What does renting accomplish that a co-op couldn’t? Other than making a landlord rich.
minus-square@someguy3link2•edit-21 year agoSigh. I’m saying that corporations can own rental apartments if they want because there is enough room for both. Corporations should not own houses.
Why? A co-op can own an apartment with occupants as co-owners. There’s no need for rent.
Sigh: Rent/own apartments. Own houses.
I ask again: why? What does renting accomplish that a co-op couldn’t? Other than making a landlord rich.
Sigh. I’m saying that corporations can own rental apartments if they want because there is enough room for both. Corporations should not own houses.