• @jordanlund
      link
      148 months ago

      There were multiple opportunities to take the shooter into custody and make sure he couldn’t own a gun before he ever bought a gun. All it takes is one felony conviction.

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robb_Elementary_School_shooting

      “He had also previously posted violent threats online.[127]”

      "Ramos’ social media acquaintances said he openly abused and killed animals such as cats and would livestream the abuse on Yubo.[128] Other social media acquaintances said that he would also livestream himself on Yubo threatening to kidnap and rape girls who used the app, as well as threatening to commit a school shooting.[127] Ramos’ account was reported to Yubo, but no action was taken.[127][129] "

      “A year before the shooting, Ramos started posting pictures to his Instagram account of semi-automatic rifles that were on his wish list. According to a friend of his, he would often drive around at night with another friend, shooting at strangers with a BB gun and egging cars.”

      " On May 14, Ramos sent a private Instagram message reading, “10 more days”. A person responded, “Are you going to shoot up a school or something?” He replied, “No, stop asking dumb questions. You’ll see.”[127]"

      “According to the Texas Department of Public Safety, in September 2021, Ramos asked his older sister to buy him a gun, but she refused.[56]”

    • @RaoulDook
      link
      English
      -178 months ago

      You can get over being mad about that because it will be here longer than you and all the rest of us.

      The right to bear arms is a great freedom that we should all celebrate.

      • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
        link
        fedilink
        13
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Yeah! Have a big party! Invite all 19 of the families whose kids were brutally slaughtered in school! I’m sure they’d love that sort of party.

        • @RaoulDook
          link
          English
          -88 months ago

          This really has nothing to do with anything I said, but go on about whatever I guess.

          • @maness300
            link
            -18 months ago

            They don’t argue in good faith.

      • @AbidanYre
        link
        English
        18 months ago

        He doesn’t seem mad. Just stating a fact.

        • @RaoulDook
          link
          English
          -38 months ago

          That was not a fact at all, that was a dumb opinion that was wrong, in fact.

          • @AbidanYre
            link
            English
            08 months ago

            You’re the only one here who seems mad about being wrong. It’s not the 18th century anymore.

            • @RaoulDook
              link
              English
              -18 months ago

              I’m the one who is most right of all, because I actually understand the law and the logistics of Constitutional Amendments. The rest of you disagreeing with me are displaying cognitive dissonance, because you don’t want to believe the truth, or just plain old ignorance.

              The fact is that the 2nd Amendment will remain in place no matter what you ever do. Because it takes a 3/4 majority of the 50 states to ratify an Amendment to change that. It only requires 13 states to vote NO to changing it to retain it. Now, go and count how many red states there are.

        • @JustUseMint
          link
          58 months ago

          What the fuck you’re proving his point dude lmao

      • @JustUseMint
        link
        -68 months ago

        I agree, bad opinion to have on lemmy though I’ll say lol

        • @RaoulDook
          link
          English
          -68 months ago

          It’s not a bad opinion anywhere, it’s just the truth and anybody who doesn’t like it is wrong.