While Education and Organizing is building the parts for a new engine the rest of the year.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    6
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Maryland:

    Hillary beat Trump 60 - 33%

    Biden beat Trump 65 - 33%

    I would argue that the folks who voted 3rd party in 2016 decided we needed to do more than just not vote for Trump in 2020. The folks who voted for Trump in 2016 and 2020 are gonna vote for him again in 2024.

    I’d say equally this year it is worthwhile to do more than just “not vote for Trump” but vote for Biden (especially if you intended to vote 3rd party … but by all means vote your conscience first!) to further cement the statement that we did not choose Trump.

    The stats show he lost no ground, the issue will be how much ground Biden has lost because of the attacks about their age and pushing folks to vote 3rd party or whatever as an act of protest.

    Vote your conscience first, but don’t protest by a third party vote. If you have no good option CHOOSE HARM REDUCTION ALWAYS

    I say this as a Bernie 2016 / 2020 voter. It still hurts. I’m choosing to reduce the harm regardless.

    • @BaldManGoomba
      link
      210 months ago

      Hillary and Biden both beat Trump by huge numbers in Maryland I can vote for 3rd party no issues. People are just scared that people from Pennsylvania have the same idea which it would actually cause harm.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        210 months ago

        You can vote for whoever you please and should.

        Vote your conscience every time.

        I’m simply arguing that it is a good idea to not rest on your laurels and when we are faced with what feels like a crazy threat to democracy maybe then its especially good to vote in your best interests instead.

        Only you can choose what your best interests are, but anyone who argues that you SHOULD protest vote probably has an agenda which is likely to get you to not vote for Biden or Trump.

    • Sybil
      link
      -210 months ago

      voting is not harm reduction.

        • Sybil
          link
          0
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          harm reduction is when you know a bad thing is going to happen, and you give the people it’s happening to resources to mitigate the harm from it. needle exchanges are the best example: people are going to use drugs. that’s bad enough with the stigma and risks of impurities etc. giving them clean needles eliminates one of the dangers, though.

          voting doesn’t give the effected people any resources to deal with the problems created by our government.

          edit:

          harm reduction would be sending medical supplies to gaza. setting up abortion care resources in the states. distributing HRT resources. voting is just that: voting.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            210 months ago

            Harm reduction, or harm minimization, refers to a range of intentional practices and public health policies designed to lessen the negative social and/or physical consequences associated with various human behaviors, both legal and illegal.

            It is harm reduction.

            • Sybil
              link
              010 months ago

              no, it’s not. harm reduction is the things you do regardless of whether democrats or republicans win.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                3
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                I don’t want either candidate, they both suck to me. I’d prefer to not have to vote for either of them. I’d prefer to vote my conscience for policy.

                Instead I am voting for the candidate who has not stated he intends to continue removing my wife’s bodily autonomy and push policies that will deliberately harm “the others” as they see them.

                Voting for Biden, despite not wanting to and wishing I had a better option, is harm reduction for those I care about because if I didn’t act I was doing nothing.

                and just to be clear, most people just do nothing

                • Sybil
                  link
                  010 months ago

                  Instead I am voting for the candidate who has not stated he intends to continue removing my wife’s bodily autonomy and push policies that will deliberately harm “the others” as they see them.

                  same here. that’s why i’m voting for cornel west (or maybe jill stein).

                • Sybil
                  link
                  010 months ago

                  Voting for Biden, despite not wanting to and wishing I had a better option, is harm reduction

                  no, it’s not.