Bananas are ridiculously cheap even up here in Canada, and they aren’t grown anywhere near here. Yet a banana can grow, be harvested, be shipped, be stocked, and then be purchased by me for less than it’d cost to mail a letter across town. (Well, if I could buy a single banana maybe…or maybe that’s not the best comparison, but I think you get my point)

Along the banana’s journey, the farmer, the harvester, the shipper, the grocer, the clerk, and the cashier all (presumably) get paid. Yet a single banana is mere cents. If you didn’t know any better, you might think a single banana should cost $10!

I’m presuming that this is because of some sort of exploitation somewhere down the line, or possibly loss-leading on the grocery store’s side of things.

I’m wondering what other products like bananas are a lot cheaper than they “should” be (e.g., based on how far they have to travel, or how difficult they are to produce, or how much money we’re saving “unethically”).

I’ve heard that this applies to coffee and chocolate to varying extents, but I’m not certain.

Anyone know any others?

  • MaggiWuerze
    link
    fedilink
    -28 months ago

    Even if the cow is responsibly raised, there’s still the question of how it was conceived. No farmer simply let’s a bull on top of a cow, since our modern cows are too big to safely mate. So usually a cow is artificially inseminated, which is an inherently violent procedure. The milk industry could simply not exist without this institutionalized rape

    • @Slowy
      link
      8
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      That’s only really true in dairy. Most meat cows are conceived using ‘natural cover’, where several bulls are just left with the ladies to do their thing.

    • JJROKCZ
      link
      18 months ago

      As you said, they can’t mate… so what’s your solution? Let them go extinct and we lose not only a beautiful creature but a significant part of our species food source and history? We’ve been drinking milk and eating beef since the dawn of animal husbandry

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        98 months ago

        Wait you’re saying it’s better to be genetically experimented on, caged, forced to breed, and be killed in your early adulthood than not have children?

        That’s it’s actually more ethical to make a creature who you later kill for your own pleasure than not to do that? because the alternative is only wild cows and cowlike creatures existing?

        They’re living beings, not museum exhibits ffs. Species don’t have preferences, individuals do.

        • JJROKCZ
          link
          -28 months ago

          Point out the wild bovine to me bruh, they don’t exist, they’re one of the many species dépendant upon humans for their survival.

            • @JubilantJaguar
              link
              48 months ago

              Very frustrating to argue with people who claim to have no concern for living creatures when in fact they probably love their dog or cat and would find it just as hard as anyone else to watch a video of what goes on in factory farms. Food choices are such a fundamental part of human culture that most people just cannot stand having them questioned, it’s as if you are questioning their religion. Alas.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                38 months ago

                Ok you should Google wild bovine. Aurochs are extinct, cows aren’t really a distinct species, and bovine specifically covers everything from wilderbeasts to yaks which all exist in the wild. So it’s worth ridiculing people so ignorant of the world and so unwilling to even do a Google search.

                Hell there are wild escaped domestic cows a day’s drive from me lmao.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -1
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  this is better, but it amounts to handwaving and anecdotes. surely you can address the logic of what they said and cite a source instead of saying “look it up”

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    38 months ago

                    no, there is no point in investing effort in a discussion when the other party wont. The commenter does not actually care whether there are or aren’t, if they cared they would look it up.

                    They want to waste my time arguing against a position they have no investment in. There is literally a Wikipedia page on wild bovines, that’s how low effort this is.

        • HACKthePRISONS
          link
          fedilink
          -88 months ago

          >it’s actually more ethical to make a creature who you later kill for your own pleasure

          no one is doing that

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            38 months ago

            What is meat farming? in most of the world at this point in time it’s much more efficient to eat plants. Nobody with access to a supermarket is eating only what meat they might need to survive with no alternatives, you eat it for pleasure. For this pleasure someone must die, therefore you kill them for pleasure.

            • HACKthePRISONS
              link
              fedilink
              -98 months ago

              if you are buying food in a supermarket your not killing anything except maybe lobsters

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                28 months ago

                If I pay someone to kill you only a lawyer or a pedant would argue I didn’t kill you. Without me you wouldn’t have died.

                • HACKthePRISONS
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -78 months ago

                  the people killing cattle are paid long before I go to the store, and they are paid by someone who isn’t me

                  • @JubilantJaguar
                    link
                    38 months ago

                    Terrible, no-good argument. By that standard you do not exist in the economy.

            • HACKthePRISONS
              link
              fedilink
              -108 months ago

              you literally don’t know what anyone else needs. you can’t dictate the diet that is right for them.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                38 months ago

                Well if someone can prove they need meat to survive and only eat the bare minimum obtained in the least terrible way I’ll engage that fictional person in discussion but that is nobody you or I know so it’s moot.

                • HACKthePRISONS
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -68 months ago

                  you literally don’t know what anyone else needs, and survival is a pretty high bar. you can survive without your electronic devices. no one is saying you should

        • HACKthePRISONS
          link
          fedilink
          -108 months ago

          >it’s better to… breed…than not have children?

          the highest benefit to any organism is to pass it’s genetic material to another generation.

    • Sybil
      link
      -48 months ago

      artificial insemination isn’t rape. it’s a veterinary procedure

        • Sybil
          link
          0
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I’m not a cow and I somehow doubt you are a veterinarian

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            48 months ago

            So it would be abhorrent right? What makes it ok to do to a cow then? Is it the prop stethoscope? the certificate of graduation on the wall? Do cows just not matter? if so why not?