If Kenneth Eugene Smith is brought to the Alabama death chamber to face execution next week for his role in the 1988 murder-for-hire of a pastor’s wife, the state plans to use an untested and untried method to end his life, suffocating him with a stream of nitrogen gas to be delivered through a face mask.

In a federal appeals court Friday, Smith’s lawyers sought to block it, arguing that not only have Smith’s constitutional rights been violated, but that he could be subjected to an agonizing death and that most of the details surrounding the state’s new execution protocol “deserve more scrutiny.”

The use of nitrogen gas will be a capital punishment first, even though it has not only been denounced by some medical professionals but also by veterinarians who oppose its use on animals. In 2020, the American Veterinary Medical Association advised against the use of nitrogen gas as a way to euthanize most mammals, calling it “distressing.” One of the few uses of nitrogen gas in animal euthanasia is with chickens.

The United Nations’ Office of The High Commissioner for Human Rights has expressed alarm, saying in a statement that the untested method “could amount to torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment under international human rights law.”

  • @Ton
    link
    811 months ago

    Of course, the revenge driven justice system is not looking for the most humane way to kill someone. The cruelty is the point.

    • @derf82
      link
      English
      011 months ago

      Except that is exactly why they are wanting to do nitrogen asphyxiation.

      • Cogency
        link
        3
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        They aren’t doing it willingly. The drug manufacturers are no longer supplying the cocktails for lethal injections and the medical field is refusing to take part in the act.

        • @derf82
          link
          English
          -211 months ago

          Yes, so they chose an alternative that is meant to be as painless as the old method.

          • Cogency
            link
            3
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            They chose a mechanical non- biological method that could proceed without the medical community, again this isn’t out of benevolence, they were forced to act less cruelly because their hands were forced by the medical community.

            And the old method was often misadministered so it was often as painful as they could make it. Link I have no doubt someone will find a way to make suffocation painful. Even if the method on the books is painless. The cruelty is/ was/ and always has been the point.

            • @derf82
              link
              English
              011 months ago

              You do love straw men.

              No, if they wanted to be cruel, they could bring back hanging, the firing squad, or the electric chair. This is better than those.

              You are making accusations with zero proof.

                • @derf82
                  link
                  English
                  011 months ago

                  That doesn’t support your allegation that it was deliberately made painful. Hell, your own link says Ohio postponed executions to reevaluate. You are adding malice solely on the bases your your opinion.

                  • Cogency
                    link
                    1
                    edit-2
                    11 months ago

                    It was deliberately made painful by the reports of the survivors. They took what was a deliberately painless set of injections and would administer massive overdoses of the killing portion of the cocktail without administering the sedative portion. I don’t want to remember how I know this. There were various reports of individual staff members overseeing the cases, included in how I’ve come to this conclusion.

                  • Cogency
                    link
                    011 months ago

                    deleted by creator