• @Aux
      link
      English
      09 months ago

      How many anarchist countries do you know?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Off the top of my head, 2. One with no UN seat and one long gone, to be fair, but they still exist and are/were sovereign. You can’t say either turned into totalitarianism.

        Maybe you could say they would have or will, but that’s just your guess. I could say the same thing about liberal democracy and be equally as well supported.

        • @Aux
          link
          English
          09 months ago

          So what are these magical countries?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            0
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Republican Spain and the “Autonomous Administration of North and East Syria” AKA Rojava.

            Republican Spain had some communist factions too, but Rojava is explicitly built around a specific strain of anarchism, and is an “administration” instead of a government. I doubt it looks very anarchist in practice, but that’s neither here nor there, and they’re democratic enough the US has endorsed them in the past to Turkey’s great displeasure.

            • @Aux
              link
              English
              09 months ago

              Republican Spain was a military faction in a Spanish Civil War, not a country.

              Rojava is Kurdish separatist group, not a country.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                0
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Bullshit. They have flags, bureaucracies and a monopoly on the use of force within their territory. I will not argue semantics with you.

                • @Aux
                  link
                  English
                  18 months ago

                  ISIS also has a flag, bureaucracy and a monopoly on the use of force. Doesn’t make them a country. If you don’t have arguments, you should not start arguing in the first place.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    0
                    edit-2
                    8 months ago

                    Actually, I’d say it made them a country, back before they lost all their territory.

                    I’m not sure what the exact term we use has to do with the fate of socialist systems anyway, so I won’t reduce myself to arguing about it. If you don’t have anything else, I think we’re done here.