The difference is that we can go beyond that limitation. Even self-coding AI will either solve a problem, or compound its own inefficiencies before asking an operator to help out.
The difference here is that Zuck is not planning on inventing or revolutionizing anything. He’s just throwing more computation power at an already inefficient method of modeling AI.
Humans are astoundigly stupid when they hit their limitations.
Spoken like a true AI!!! ;-)
The difference is that we can go beyond that limitation. Even self-coding AI will either solve a problem, or compound its own inefficiencies before asking an operator to help out.
Your post sounds almost as dense as:
“everything that can be invented has been invented.” - Duell 1899.
The difference here is that Zuck is not planning on inventing or revolutionizing anything. He’s just throwing more computation power at an already inefficient method of modeling AI.
Some people do. Some people refuse to ask for help.