Too many of the potential jurors said that even if the defendant, Elisa Meadows, was guilty, they were unwilling to issue the $500 fine a city attorney was seeking, said Ren Rideauxx, Meadows’ attorney.

  • capital
    link
    010 months ago

    Speech is restricted in the courthouse? What the fuck?

    • @Maggoty
      link
      3
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Yes, and there are good reasons for it. Imagine if the victims family met the jurors and told them stories from the victim’s childhood.

      Of course authoritarian figures take this good reason and stretch it out to cover things people should know about too. In the case of jury nullification the reason is how it was used by white juries through history. They would routinely return a not guilty verdict if the victim was black.

      But that can also be solved with a diverse jury and majority verdict for a half sentence. (10 years instead of 20, and no capital punishment without a unanimous jury). They went with restricting speech on it because it also affected the shit laws they were pushing about drugs and protesting.