• @vsg
    link
    English
    211 year ago

    Trump supporters often have manias of persecution. Wouldn’t these signs feed it, though?

    • @seejur
      link
      English
      401 year ago

      They’ll find a way to feel persecuted regardless. So why not?

      • @zinaer
        link
        English
        91 year ago

        Meh, show them what real persecution is.

          • ANGRY_MAPLE
            link
            fedilink
            English
            5
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I will happily distance myself from a hateful person WAY before I distance myself from someone just for existing. Only one is an active choice.

            If unreasonable exclusion of people is so harmless, these hateful people really shouldn’t give a shit. I’ll pick a happy person over a raging person any day.

              • ANGRY_MAPLE
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I can also make it “Frank Beatrice”. What’s your point?

                (Some weird things come from inside jokes that no one really needs to know)

    • @TheThemFatale
      link
      English
      251 year ago

      Probably. But if they don’t get it here, they’ll find it elsewhere. We shouldn’t change things to mollycoddle people who are constantly seeking a reason to be offended.

      • gk99
        link
        English
        241 year ago

        For all their complaining about safe spaces, they’re the ones who seemingly need it the most.

        Probably because reality is left-leaning.

        • @TheThemFatale
          link
          English
          181 year ago

          Like their appeals to “basic biology”, when actual basic biology is still trans-supportive.

          • littleblue✨
            link
            English
            16
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            They’d lose their little minds at the countless species that shift gender when necessitated by circumstance, not to mention the ones that generally propagate their line by mating with themselves. Don’t even get me started about the evolutionary origins of “labyrinthine vaginas” or the necro proclivities of sea otters. 🤦🏼‍♂️

            Simply put: a healthy reading habit is a great inoculation against idiocy. Critical thinking is invaluable.

            edit: I’m not drawing a line between any of that, except to point out that a lack of knowledge is no foundation for loud opinions.

            • @dustyData
              link
              English
              71 year ago

              They are fine with parthenogenesis though, apparently.

              • littleblue✨
                link
                English
                21 year ago

                For real, though. I hope I’m alive to see the archaeological science tech improve to the point we can finally uncover the story about that mystery baby-daddy: was he a local, and that’s why they left town? Maybe he was a traveling sandal salesman (there’s a lot of foot washing in that book, just sayin’), and Joseph got wind he was spotted in Bethlehem? Somebody’s got that ancient tea, and I wanna sip!

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              31 year ago

              The problem is that these people are stupid by design. Republicans have been cutting funding for schools all over the country for a lot of years now. They need people to be dumb or they’d never vote for them.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              a lack of knowledge is no foundation for loud opinions

              In my experience a lack of knowledge is the main foundation for loud opinions. Those who have more knowledge tend to be quieter, and more willing to rethink their opinions when presented with an opposing argument

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              Your statement falls into at least one of the many logical fallacies. Many species do many things that humans don’t. Humans do many things that other species don’t. It’s a dishonest comparison. I don’t necessarily disagree with your reasoning behind it, but there are better arguments to be made.