Bloved Madman to [email protected]English • 5 months agoSurface Laptop 3 running Kubuntu, such an improvement over what it was "designed" for.imagemessage-square83arrow-up1338arrow-down119 cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1319arrow-down1imageSurface Laptop 3 running Kubuntu, such an improvement over what it was "designed" for.Bloved Madman to [email protected]English • 5 months agomessage-square83 cross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@TCB13linkEnglish1•5 months agoEverything’s about perspective… maybe GNOME became SO bloated that KDE now seems very light. :P
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•5 months agoLook on phoronix for benchmarks. Plasma consumes less RAM and CPU than even XFCE.
minus-square@TCB13linkEnglish1•edit-25 months agoHold on, I was kind of joking, I’m not saying KDE is slow. GNOME for sure is slow as hell.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•5 months agoAll good, but I think it’s really often a misconception that a DE like KDE, which is big and brings tons of features, must be more ressource intensive than a (feature wise) smaller DE. Which, as the benchmarks show, is surprisingly not the case.
Everything’s about perspective… maybe GNOME became SO bloated that KDE now seems very light. :P
Look on phoronix for benchmarks. Plasma consumes less RAM and CPU than even XFCE.
Hold on, I was kind of joking, I’m not saying KDE is slow. GNOME for sure is slow as hell.
All good, but I think it’s really often a misconception that a DE like KDE, which is big and brings tons of features, must be more ressource intensive than a (feature wise) smaller DE. Which, as the benchmarks show, is surprisingly not the case.