Is there lead paint in the food over there? motherfucker refused to pack the court, just like his predecessors, then shits and whines that he’s powerless to stop the court from passing republican policies.
You lot think he’s against these policies when he’s happy to let them pass as long as it keeps you all voting for him.
Pack the court, or force congress to give statehood to DC and PR which would give Dems ability to approve appointees. These are just off the top of my head.
I think they meant there’s no point in you arguing with the other person. The one who said that to you isn’t the same person who doesn’t understand civics.
So? That, again, is not how the separation of powers works. The president cannot order an end to the filibuster. That is not something within his power set.
Only the senate can end the filibuster and only through a vote.
He may “lead the Democratic party,” but he does not lead the senate and there is no reason that the senate Democrats have to do what he wants. I can only think you are very ignorant about the U.S. government or you would know that Sinema and Manchin would never have agreed to that.
I get it, you passed the civics course your football coach taught. There are many real powers politicians have that aren’t written into bylaws. Trump still has the entire GOP by the balls despite being out for 3+ years, but Biden gets a pass for being unable to whip 2 senators.
Insulting me doesn’t explain how Biden could end the filibuster when Manchin was dead set against it. Why do you think he could whip those two senators on ending the filibuster when he couldn’t even do it to get his agenda passed without making huge concessions?
He can’t make a justice retire, and he can’t appoint new justices until a sitting one quits or dies. The president needs Congress to increase the size of the court, so that’s not an option to him either. The president cannot “force Congress” to do anything. He certainly can’t force them to create new states on his whim.
If the presidency had that kind of power Trump would have used it when he was in office, though to much different ends.
Sorry, what was he supposed to do… assassinate Clarence Thomas?
Yes
Is there lead paint in the food over there? motherfucker refused to pack the court, just like his predecessors, then shits and whines that he’s powerless to stop the court from passing republican policies.
You lot think he’s against these policies when he’s happy to let them pass as long as it keeps you all voting for him.
Pack the court, or force congress to give statehood to DC and PR which would give Dems ability to approve appointees. These are just off the top of my head.
How would he go about this legally?
He can’t even force congress to pass his stated agenda. How the hell could he force congress to do that?
No point in arguing with a guy who never passed a basic civics course.
Okay, well then talk to me instead and explain how those two things could be achieved.
I think they meant there’s no point in you arguing with the other person. The one who said that to you isn’t the same person who doesn’t understand civics.
Ah, my apologies.
Yeah, sorry, wasn’t referring to you not knowing. The other idiot clearly doesn’t know.
I was confused myself about who responded to me, so I apologize too.
Big assumption about me, but okay. Keep assuming everyone you disagree with is dumb and I’m sure it will work out well for you.
Working out pretty well so far. Your comments to other posts though indicate my assumption is not an incorrect one.
End the filibuster in 2021 like many many people advised him to do so Republicans couldn’t obstruct the entire term. It’s really not complicated.
How exactly would Biden, in the executive branch, end the filibuster, which is in the legislative branch?
Do you even understand about the idea of the separation of powers?
You understand he leads the Democratic party, which is in Congress, right?
So? That, again, is not how the separation of powers works. The president cannot order an end to the filibuster. That is not something within his power set.
Only the senate can end the filibuster and only through a vote.
He may “lead the Democratic party,” but he does not lead the senate and there is no reason that the senate Democrats have to do what he wants. I can only think you are very ignorant about the U.S. government or you would know that Sinema and Manchin would never have agreed to that.
I mean you don’t have to take my word for it, take Manchin’s- https://www.manchin.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/manchin-again-reiterates-his-commitment-to-protecting-filibuster
I get it, you passed the civics course your football coach taught. There are many real powers politicians have that aren’t written into bylaws. Trump still has the entire GOP by the balls despite being out for 3+ years, but Biden gets a pass for being unable to whip 2 senators.
Insulting me doesn’t explain how Biden could end the filibuster when Manchin was dead set against it. Why do you think he could whip those two senators on ending the filibuster when he couldn’t even do it to get his agenda passed without making huge concessions?
Also, why on Earth do you think whipping senators is the president’s job when there is literally a person called the majority whip?
I mean if you aren’t aware of that, and you don’t seem to be, I’m not sure you should be insulting other people about their civics knowledge.
He can’t make a justice retire, and he can’t appoint new justices until a sitting one quits or dies. The president needs Congress to increase the size of the court, so that’s not an option to him either. The president cannot “force Congress” to do anything. He certainly can’t force them to create new states on his whim.
If the presidency had that kind of power Trump would have used it when he was in office, though to much different ends.