@prettydarknwild to [email protected]English • 1 year agolemmy servers rnimagemessage-square61arrow-up1696arrow-down15
arrow-up1691arrow-down1imagelemmy servers rn@prettydarknwild to [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square61
minus-square@psilves1linkEnglish0•1 year agoLemmy’s would benefit from scaling horizontally (more instances) instead of vertically (bigger instances)
minus-square@AllGoesUpMustGoDownlinkEnglish3•1 year agoNot necessarily. New users gravitate towards established, large instances, such as lemmy.world and lemmy.ml. Expanding horizontally would just create a few laggy and overflowing instances, and a bunch of tiny instances no one uses.
minus-square@psilves1linkEnglish0•1 year agoAnd once the devs can’t maintain server costs, they should shut down new registrations. There’s no need to charge for servers
minus-square@AllGoesUpMustGoDownlinkEnglish1•1 year agoWell, you have a point. Problem would be to get users to use the smaller instances.
Lemmy’s would benefit from scaling horizontally (more instances) instead of vertically (bigger instances)
Not necessarily. New users gravitate towards established, large instances, such as lemmy.world and lemmy.ml. Expanding horizontally would just create a few laggy and overflowing instances, and a bunch of tiny instances no one uses.
And once the devs can’t maintain server costs, they should shut down new registrations.
There’s no need to charge for servers
Well, you have a point. Problem would be to get users to use the smaller instances.