nukeM to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish • 1 year agoHey guys I got an ideash.itjust.worksimagemessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up1432arrow-down18
arrow-up1424arrow-down1imageHey guys I got an ideash.itjust.worksnukeM to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square23fedilink
minus-square@neidu2@feddit.nlMlinkfedilinkEnglish-12•edit-21 year agoI like that those numbers coincidentally add up to 100
minus-square@AVincentInSpace@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglish35•1 year agoThey’re percentages, so they’d better
minus-square@skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.deMlinkfedilinkEnglish8•1 year agoat some pooling stations turnout exceeded 100%, with something like 90%+ of votes for putin
minus-squarenukeOPMlinkfedilinkEnglish7•edit-21 year agoYour percentages only add up to 100? Sorry I always give 110%
minus-square@Gladaed@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglish5•1 year agoNo, rounding errors mean they typically do not. E.g. 2.7% 10.6% and 86.7% would become 3% 11% an 87% which sum to 101.
minus-square@deur@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglish12•1 year agoGood thing software has never been known to have fixes for problems like that as polish items.
I like that those numbers coincidentally add up to 100
They’re percentages, so they’d better
You familiar with russian voting percentages?
Enlighten me
at some pooling stations turnout exceeded 100%, with something like 90%+ of votes for putin
Your percentages only add up to 100? Sorry I always give 110%
No, rounding errors mean they typically do not. E.g. 2.7% 10.6% and 86.7% would become 3% 11% an 87% which sum to 101.
Good thing software has never been known to have fixes for problems like that as polish items.
Why would you assume they round up without decimals?
Stay in school, kids. 🫣