The science of domino effects regarding climate is not set in stone or even fully understood. It could be really bad, or it may not be as bad as some suspect. I don’t really see the utility in assuming the worst of something that could be fixable, or at least mitigated.

Personally, I’m going to look at the proposition of complete and utter doom with a healthy dose of skepticism, and continue to try to make things better where possible.

Out of curiosity, why do you consciously choose to discourage others from trying to make things better? I guess if I thought we were all doomed, there wouldn’t be much point in telling others that we’re doomed, since it’d be irrelevant anyway. I’d just do my own thing and attempt to live my life to the fullest ability that I have.

I think a bunch of people are going to die, yes. I also think, like a lot of experts who have studied the issue, that action now will produce effective results from among some different possibilities, not all of which are extinction. There’s still a potentially drastic reduction in the level of horror that’s involved in the outcome, largely because the outcomes at the bad ends of the possibilities are so, so bad.

That’s why I use the example of the zombie movie. You’re trying to argue that because the situation is horrible (which, yes, it is), it’s okay to resign yourself and everyone else to an even more horrible future, and you’re actively trying to discourage people who are trying to at least do what they can. I think that’s a stupid and counterproductive thing to do.