• @Rapidcreek
    link
    English
    -38 months ago

    You are not asked to believe it.

    • @OccamsTeapot
      link
      English
      78 months ago

      Nobody should believe anything because of a “bro trust me” and if you do you have a serious problem. I know nobody cares if I believe it, I am not stupid

      • @Rapidcreek
        link
        English
        -48 months ago

        Denual is a refuge for weak arguments. Obviously the the countries that control fund8ng are not in denial.

        • ???
          link
          English
          8
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Bruh, “above our paygrade” is a prime example of denial, deflection, and appeal to authority.

          • @Rapidcreek
            link
            English
            -68 months ago

            Another way of saying I do not have the information that the various countries have is not denial.

        • @OccamsTeapot
          link
          English
          78 months ago

          Scepticism in the face of a lack of evidence, especially for a claim from one side involved in a war, is not only a good idea but necessary. Would you just believe a Russian claim about Ukranian schools, no questions asked?

          • @Rapidcreek
            link
            English
            -48 months ago

            You can be a skeptic as much as you want. But, the funding countries aren’t. The UN having already fired personnel aren’t.

    • Deceptichum
      link
      fedilink
      58 months ago

      Than we won’t support our governments for blindly believing it.

      • @Rapidcreek
        link
        English
        -68 months ago

        They have the information so they’re not blind. At least not as blind as you.

        • ???
          link
          English
          88 months ago

          So “trust me bro” then?

          • @assassin_aragorn
            link
            English
            -1
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Yeah, or about Russia invading Ukraine! Wait.

            If you look at documents at the time, intelligence agencies said there was a possibility he had WMDs, but there was no conclusive evidence nor assurances.

            The Bush Administration lied to Congress and said we knew for sure they had them.

            Edit: It’s good to have healthy skepticism – it hasn’t escaped my notice that the majority of evidence behind this claim is coming from Israel. I don’t think it’s wise to deem it automatically false however, and pulling funding is premature. There should however be a serious internal investigation. And if they already have smoking guns, the UN should release them in the interest of transparency.

            Apologies for starting out my comment as a bit of a jackass.