• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2710 months ago

    I’m excited for the wannabe domestic terrorists in West Texas to realize that sparsely vegetated and habituated scrubland is a drone operator’s ISR wet dream to thwack pickup convoys, and have a public come-to-Jesus moment before decrying this pointless dick measuring contest. Any kind armed rebellion without near total collapse of the federal government, is a fantasy

    • @lemmefixdat4u
      link
      710 months ago

      You don’t even need drones. Insurgents aren’t particularly technical, and tend to use unsecured communications that are easily pinpointed for a precision HIMARS or smart artillery strike. Ask the Russians how it went for them. They lost thousands in Ukraine because soldiers used cellphones to call home to Mama - calls processed through Ukrainian cellular towers.

    • @doingthestuff
      link
      410 months ago

      You don’t think if the government started sending drones after pickups that they wouldn’t gain more popular support?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          010 months ago

          The gov would gain some too. From me at least.

          It’s starting to feel a bit like the biggest problems (climate, billionaires, guns, inequality) in the world will need such huge changes to the status quo, that something massive will have to happen to initiate it.

          I hope I’m wrong though.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        010 months ago

        Words and anger? Definitely. Support/action? Very likely no.

        It’s the same problem AQA & ISIS have: you are powerless against the drone without MADPADs, and you aren’t getting those - maybe not even with proxy state support. How does the ‘Trump Train’ achieve anything beyond banditry-level terrorism, against an air power with PGMs?