The framework for a deal that could lead to a ceasefire and the release of hostages held in Gaza is being put to the Hamas leadership, Qatar’s prime minister, Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani, said on Monday.

Speaking after talks in Paris between officials from the US, Qatar, Egypt and Israel, he said: “We are in a better place than we were a few weeks ago.”

The basis of the deal is a 45-day pause in the fighting leading to the release of 35 Israeli hostages and as many as 4,000 Palestinian prisoners from Israeli jails.

But Israel remains opposed to a permanent ceasefire and wants to retain a right to recommence hostilities against Hamas – something that the Hamas leadership wants ruled out.

Archive

  • @Arete
    link
    English
    -31 year ago

    Holy shit 4000 prisoners for 35 hostages and Hamas still says no. Pretty clear they’re not negotiating in good faith.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      During the last ceasefire, Israel took more hostages than they released. I can understand why Hamas might be skeptical about new deals without a long-term ceasefire guarantee.

      • @Arete
        link
        English
        11 year ago

        In what universe would a ceasefire be counterproductive to Hamas? They’re getting wrecked on a daily basis.

        I don’t think they have 35 “returnable” hostages at this point.

          • @Arete
            link
            English
            -31 year ago

            Ok but if they have no interest in a ceasefire or hostage exchange, then they are by definition negotiating in bad faith…

              • @Arete
                link
                English
                -41 year ago

                That’s a fair point. I don’t know to what extent they were involved in negotiations. I think it was significant as we’ve had several days of news about “constructive” negotiations, but I can’t prove that.

    • @Gradually_Adjusting
      link
      English
      -31 year ago

      Important to remember that there are no good guys in this mess, only bastards and bystanders

      • @Arete
        link
        English
        41 year ago

        You including the hostages in that?

          • @Arete
            link
            English
            01 year ago

            They look more like victims to me, being taken hostage for 4 months and all. But you do you

            • @Cosmonauticus
              link
              English
              11 year ago

              Bystander just means they don’t subscribe to either side. You can both be a bystander and victim…

              • @Arete
                link
                English
                -11 year ago

                Bystander, noun: “a person who is present at an event or incident but does not take part.”

                They were bystanders until they were taken hostage. Now they’re being forced to take part involuntarily, which makes them victims.

                Super weird point to fight on. Obviously there are victims in every war.