• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    010 months ago

    Generally if someone is clearly in breach of copyright the rights holder will apply to a court to issue an injunction to order that company to cease their activities until a case can be resolved.

    Given that has not happened, it seems that from a court’s perspective, it’s not a clear breach of copyright.

    • @Ross_audio
      link
      110 months ago

      The rights holder first considers the size of the payout vs. the cost of legal fees.

      Just because they haven’t been sued directly for this doesn’t make it infringement.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        010 months ago

        Nonsense. If this is copyright the payout will be many billions. They’ve had a year to think about it.

        • @Ross_audio
          link
          110 months ago

          The statute of limitations is much longer than a year. It’s usually around 5.

          They can wait, see who’s made the money, then target them for a payout.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            110 months ago

            A court wouldn’t look favourably on that.

            Rights couldn’t have been very b important if you just let it run.

            • @Ross_audio
              link
              110 months ago

              They really don’t care. It can take a lot of time to put a solid case together and you’re better off having a solid case than a quick trial.