I am wrong in thinking the circumference or the diameter of a circle has to be rational?

  • @Alteon
    link
    11
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    What’s interesting is that no matter how big or how small your circle is, pi is a constant ratio of the diameter to the perimeter (or circumference) of your circle. If you were to cut a string to the length of your circle’s diameter, it WILL take 3.14 lengths of string to wrap around the circle (or π times). That’s where that number comes from.

    Because of this ratio, there will never be a situation in which both the diameter and circumference are both rational numbers at the same time. Either your Diameter is a rational number or your circumference. For example:

    P=πD

    If D=1… Then P=π(1) or P=π

    If P=1… Then P=π(1/π) where D=(1/π)

      • @Alteon
        link
        410 months ago

        *rational

        Good catch. Fixed. I apparently suck with words sometimes. Intent good. Execution flawed. :)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      310 months ago

      huh - I never thought of it that way but of course it makes total sense.

      I love this question - simple but thought provoking!

    • @SkyezOpen
      link
      210 months ago

      If you were to cut a string to the length of your circle’ diameter, it WILL ALWAYS wrap around by 3.14159 (or π times).

      Isn’t that backwards?

        • @SkyezOpen
          link
          210 months ago

          Right, so you’d need 3.14 strings of length D to cover the circle, D wouldn’t wrap around it itself.

          • @Alteon
            link
            210 months ago

            It was implied that it would wrap around the circle. I’ll update original post to clarify better.

            • @SkyezOpen
              link
              310 months ago

              Yeah that’s what I gathered, but it’s backwards. C = Pi D means you need pi strings, not that it’ll cover the circle pi times.

              • @Alteon
                link
                410 months ago

                Ahhhh. I see what your saying. It’s fixed.

                Yeah. Did not mean to intend that it wraps fully around the circle pi times. Good catch.