• AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
    link
    English
    -311 months ago

    Depending on the job, that can be pretty fucked up for the people you work with. Your co-workers often deserve some consideration too. If you’re doing something that doesn’t require knowledge transfer, then whatever, but if you have specific and complex knowledge of systems that you need to transfer to other people who will be responsible for maintaining them in your absence, it’s pretty messed up to just dump that shit in their lap.

    • @ohlaph
      link
      English
      1011 months ago

      That is just a sign of poor management in general. If an employee quitting causes that much disruption, there is usual a direct correlation with poor practices.

    • @grue
      link
      English
      811 months ago

      Your co-workers often deserve some consideration too.

      If they don’t like it, they should unionize.

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
        link
        English
        711 months ago

        Unionization doesn’t magically allow everyone to know everything about what happens at your place of work.

        • @grue
          link
          English
          1211 months ago

          It lets them negotiate rules about not firing people without notice, and is otherwise highly correlated with being the kind of place people don’t want to quit without notice.

          It also gives them power to be able to make other demands, such as (for example) being given enough time to properly document processes and get cross-training and such.

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
        link
        English
        611 months ago

        Having some documents isn’t the same as having a knowledge transfer session.