• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4310 months ago

    An individual landlord isn’t buying hundreds of properties, but hundreds of individual landlords (all saying “it’s not my fault, I only own three houses!”) are buying hundreds of properties.

    Even if each individual landlord is a good person who’s going to heaven, they still make the housing market worse for everyone else. Their interests are directly opposed to working class people.

    • @PriorityMotif
      link
      -610 months ago

      There is demand for houses for rent by private landlords. Many people don’t want to rent in a multi unit from a large company, especially in lower income areas. Buying isn’t really a good option short term, especially in lower income areas, as houses don’t appreciate in those areas as much as in higher cost of living areas. If you’re planning on living somewhere for only a few years, then it doesn’t make sense to buy a house.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1110 months ago

        In the current system, what you’re saying is true. However, if we think of a system where each person can only own one or two houses by law, and houses are therefore much cheaper, buying for a short time wouldn’t be as bad. Potentially there could be a couple of houses owned by each city council to rent out in the short term for people who don’t want to buy.

        If we want to be radical (which I do), make housing a right and guarantee it for every citizen. Abolish capitalism and the profit motive for owning multiple houses. Whole system’s fucked as it is right now.

        • @PriorityMotif
          link
          -410 months ago

          You will still have costs associated with owning a house such as maintenance and repairs. If you buy a house and then have to put a roof/furnace/ major repair then you lost money if you only own the house for a few years.

          • @hark
            link
            3
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            I had a new furnace put in last year and the cost was less than a month’s rent. Granted, I “knew a guy” but still, the quotes I got from others were two months of rent or less and you’re not going to replace a furnace every year or anything close to that. I’m not renting btw, this was for my own house. I don’t like the idea of being a landlord.

            • @PriorityMotif
              link
              110 months ago

              Damn, much is rent near you? My mortgage is only $1k/mo including taxes and insurance.

              • @hark
                link
                110 months ago

                Rent is $3000 a month around here. Mortgages aren’t a fair comparison since there are many factors in reducing that monthly payment. One problem I’ve heard of is people being denied on their mortgage application because they supposedly don’t make enough or have good enough credit so they’re stuck making much more expensive rent payments instead. Check out the rental market near you, it’s likely more expensive than your mortgage payment.

                • @PriorityMotif
                  link
                  110 months ago

                  It is, that’s one reason why I bought a house. But a decent rental isn’t over $2k/ mo here. You could probably find a decent house for rent for $1200.

                  The lender said he’d never seen a perfect credit score before me. They approved me for double what I was willing to spend and I only have a factory job. If you can’t be responsible enough to have a decent credit score, then owning a house isn’t for you either.

                  • @hark
                    link
                    110 months ago

                    Back to the original point I was making, that new furnace + installation was than three months of your mortgage payment. People talk about how there are unforeseen costs with home ownership, and there are, but with the money you save paying a mortgage instead of rent, you can save up the money to account for those costs. After all, rent already includes such costs plus profit on top of that. Except for some wildly rare circumstances, no one is renting out property at a loss.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            210 months ago

            Again, I agree with you in the current system - assuming you have a landlord who upholds their end of the bargain and does maintenance. In my ideal world though, you’d just hit up your neighbours and they’d help you fix the problem because they know you’ll be there for them when they need it and because money is obsolete.