I feel that this is what we should be using instead of the current illogical time system.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1310 months ago

    I feel like trying to switch to this would cause more problems than it would solve. If you switch to this time system, what do you do about all the other units of measure that include a time component? Either everything has to change, or you have to start using two different time systems.

    • @Noodle07
      link
      English
      2310 months ago

      Something something xkcd new standard

      • Zagorath
        link
        fedilink
        English
        610 months ago

        Dates? Swatch replaces seconds, minutes, and hours with .beats. Metres per second (used in scientific contexts), minutes per kilometre (used by runners), and kilometres per hour (used in most other contexts) would all be unusable under Swatch time.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          310 months ago

          If we were using beats, it would be meters per .beat I guess. Many physical constants would be different numbers but that’s about it

          • wjrii
            link
            fedilink
            110 months ago

            …but that’s about it

            That’s not how people work. You think Americans are stubborn about our customary units? Try damn-near everyone (including many Americans) with SI.

            Time in particular is unlikely to be significantly reworked because you can only push the inconsistencies out so far. So you divide the day into a thousand beats. Great. A year is still not an integer number of days, and weeks and months are only loosely based on physical (lunar) phenomena at all.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          (measure) per (new measure of time)

          It would be very inconvenient at first, but it doesn’t change the math.