• @myslsl
      link
      110 months ago

      It seems like you should understand my point/position before you reply to me if you want this conversation to be productive? Why is understanding those things irrelevant to you?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        010 months ago

        Why is understanding those things irrelevant to you?

        Because philosophy, debate and logic were part of the basic school curriculum when I was a kid, and as a result I understand your particular subjective perpective is irrelevant to this conversation…

        • @myslsl
          link
          010 months ago

          How do you know my point is subjective if you do not understand my point in the first place?

            • @myslsl
              link
              010 months ago

              I’m “oh-so-focused” on that because you’re “oh-so-focused” on telling me about “empirical investigations” that disprove the existence of gods, which have literally nothing at all to do with my point.

                • @myslsl
                  link
                  010 months ago

                  The lack of reading comprehension here is definitely on your end.

                  Me (sans-snarkyness) in the original comment you replied to: “Hey, the field of philosophy where this stuff is studied is called philosophy of religion. Proofs for and against the existence of a god have been critiqued to shit there. You should read about it.”

                  You: “Oh yeah! Well I can disprove any god you like.”

                  Congrats? Do you want a gold star or something?

                  Go study philosophy of religion. These kinds of proofs and disproofs are part of that field along with their critiques. That’s the point I’m making in the comment you originally replied to. Nothing about my point is subjective.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    210 months ago

                    As I stated, you’re functionally illiterate. I’d recommend reviewing your basic literature curriculum from the start.

                    From

                    Point me to a god and I’ll dismantle them.

                    You understood

                    Well I can disprove any god you like.

                    Instead of the well established concept

                    Any supernatural phenomenon, upon rigorous delineation, becomes provably false