He signed an executive order on Thursday, saying violence had reached “intolerable levels”.

The sanctions will block the individuals from accessing all US property and other assets.

Violence in the West Bank has spiked since Hamas’s 7 October attack on Israel.

  • @ikidd
    link
    English
    125 months ago

    Their shit disturbing at every opportunity is probably creating more problems than supporting them fixes. Every time Mossad goes off page and assassinates someone else, they’re making more enemies.

    We know it’s because if there was ever peace accidentally made in that area, Israel would be out of a job and hence the money, so there’s no fucking way they’re going to let that happen. So destabilizing the area is in Israel’s best interests.

    • PatFusty
      link
      fedilink
      -12
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Huh??? How does Israel lose money if there was peace??? I am curious to hear your opinion on what kind of revenues makes up Israel’s GDP and where instability of the Middle East fits into that.

        • PatFusty
          link
          fedilink
          -65 months ago

          So the usual $5B in aid that Israel gets. You know Israels GDP was close to $600B last year right?

          • @Buddahriffic
            cake
            link
            65 months ago

            They had a budget surplus of less than $5b least year, so that money still makes a difference. Not sure if it’s just the usual $5b either right now, I didn’t go digging hard for it, but the data I saw for for much aid the US sends Israel was from before Oct.

            • PatFusty
              link
              fedilink
              -55 months ago

              I think you have a misunderstanding on how these funds work

              • @Buddahriffic
                cake
                link
                55 months ago

                US government gives $5b to various US weapons manufacturers who then send weapons to Israel, who then has weapons without needing to spend their own budget money on them, saving $5b.

                • PatFusty
                  link
                  fedilink
                  15 months ago

                  What do they need this funding for again? Would they need this if there was peace?

                  • @Buddahriffic
                    cake
                    link
                    15 months ago

                    They might. There’s peace because attacking is too dangerous (what they have now, at least with the nations not attacking them) vs peace because treaties are in place vs peace because no one wants to attack them. That middle one is risky because situations can change fast.

                    And there’s another angle that questions whether they wouldn’t need weapons during peace for less generous reasons.