• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    211 months ago

    As I stated, you’re functionally illiterate. I’d recommend reviewing your basic literature curriculum from the start.

    From

    Point me to a god and I’ll dismantle them.

    You understood

    Well I can disprove any god you like.

    Instead of the well established concept

    Any supernatural phenomenon, upon rigorous delineation, becomes provably false

    • @myslsl
      link
      011 months ago

      Sorry for getting your panties in a twist over paraphrasing your totally irrelevant point. Please understand, I don’t give a shit about what you think you can prove or disprove.

      Any supernatural phenomenon, upon rigorous delineation, becomes provably false

      Great point, one of the MAJOR challenges with arguments about whether a god does or does not exist is that the whole notion of a god is incredibly vague and not “rigorously delineated” in a general sense. Literally any introductory course in philosophy of religion would point this out.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        111 months ago

        Great point, one of the MAJOR challenges with arguments about whether a god does or does not exist is that the whole notion of a god is incredibly vague and not “rigorously delineated” in a general sense. Literally any introductory course in philosophy of religion would point this out.

        So not only are you functionally illiterate, but you’re also largely ignorant of the field you claim to have some sort of knowledge on. Great going, chief. Just a little headsup - philosophy isn’t short for “we talk about shit while holding a beer”.

        • @myslsl
          link
          -111 months ago

          Have you studied philosophy of religion? Sounds a lot like you haven’t. Maybe reading up on it will help you? You can fix your reading comprehension and also learn not to say the dumbest shit possible on topics of religion. It’s really a win-win for you.