Queva’s posts, which have still not been taken down, are of a rambling and vitriolic nature, and she refers to the “holohoax” and “AshkeNazis”, the latter of which is a play on the word ‘ashkenazi’, meaning Jews who descend from those who lived in Central or Eastern Europe.

MBFC rating:

  • Deceptichum
    link
    fedilink
    211 months ago

    This person was a schedule co-ordinator, their job role is to schedule meetings for staff. They have zero influence over the BBC’s content and their personal views are frankly irrelevant.

    This is barely any more concerning than hearing a janitor at a McDonald’s was racist.

    • @dezmd
      link
      English
      1011 months ago

      If an openly vocal white supremacist works at my local McDs even as a janitor, Im not going to McDs.

      Their views and influences are relevant in the real world, and affect coworkers.

      • Deceptichum
        link
        fedilink
        7
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        McDonalds employs millions of people across the world, and you would let one insignificant idiot who was disciplined over it define the company?

        That’s certainly an extreme take, especially when action has been taken against said employee.

        This article is grasping at straws.

        • @WidowsFavoriteSon
          link
          English
          011 months ago

          Antisemitism is so easy for others to pass off as inconsequential. In fact, folks like you have been doing it for a millenia or two.

          • Deceptichum
            link
            fedilink
            111 months ago

            One persons views are inconsequential and this is part of a wider effort to brandish antisemtism as a weapon to discredit trusted institutions who are speaking out against Israeli war crimes.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      511 months ago

      Yeah it’s just the latest in the long, long, long, long, long, long, long series of isolated incidents of antisemitism by BBC staff, which is totally not indicative of an institutional problem. Neither is the fact that they’ve spent the better part of half a billion keeping the public from finding out the contents of the Balen Report.