• Rentlar
    link
    fedilink
    798 months ago

    Everywhere we should start changing parking charges to “by the foot”. The longer your car is the more you need to pay. That will incentivize smaller, safer cars for people that don’t really have any need for something big.

    • @BassaForte
      link
      English
      298 months ago

      Nah, square footage instead of length.

        • @filister
          link
          20
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Let’s ban archaic units like feet and stick with cubic meter.

          Plus there are vans, so the more accurate metric would be a cubic meter per passenger.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            18 months ago

            Oh yeah I’d prefer metric, but I was just being consistent with the thread, as the actual units are somewhat beside my point.

            Now to find why I didn’t get a notification for this reply…

        • @BassaForte
          link
          English
          48 months ago

          Ah yeah, that’s more accurate to what I was thinking

          • @saltesc
            link
            98 months ago

            Yeah, and just register it in a database. Like how I gotta pay $100 more in vehicle registration because my car’s 50 fucking kg above the lower bracket. People with F350s can pay triple what I do. No, sextuple! Because they can’t fit in just one park. Parking inspector puts in the number plate and machine calculates the rest.

          • @BassaForte
            link
            English
            58 months ago

            That’s how we get double decker cars lol

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      68 months ago

      I need the length in my car right now. I’d rather charge by weight. I like sedans (currently in a wagon). What I’d like to get rid of is big trucks for no reason

      • @ChapulinColorado
        link
        12
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        But the cost of constructing parking infrastructure is more directly related to square meters than weight (in HCOL areas especially). Sure more weight means beefier structures and/or pavement are needed, but that tends to average over an area vs a large object requiring a larger investment regardless of whether it’s light or not.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            18 months ago

            Public transport is currently quadruple the price, double the duration and significantly more unreliable than personal car travel in the UK when travelling with another person.

            Unfortunately it’s just not viable to traverse major cities via train. I think it can be far better than it is right now but I have zero confidence it ever will be