It’s when nuclear is used as a proposal ignoring the amount of time and expense it takes to bring a new plant online. They know it won’t happen, but they’ve put off the solar and wind project a few more years in the process.
Weird I’ve never heard any one argue we should use one instead of the other. Obviously we need all forms of alternative energy being explored so we can create as many viable options as possible
What is the argument against nuclear energy as a transionary baseload supply?
It’s when nuclear is used as a proposal ignoring the amount of time and expense it takes to bring a new plant online. They know it won’t happen, but they’ve put off the solar and wind project a few more years in the process.
Weird I’ve never heard any one argue we should use one instead of the other. Obviously we need all forms of alternative energy being explored so we can create as many viable options as possible