• @droning_in_my_ears
    link
    -28 months ago

    Use zip not tar.gz. I just lost 2GBs of data because the archive was corrupted out of nowhere :')

    Only then do I find out that if a zip file id corrupted the damage is only done to one compressed file unlike tar where the damage affects everything after it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      16
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Tar is just concatenated data so that an entire file structure can be written to tape. This means that your archive is recoverable provided that it gunzips fine.

      I’ve used tar.gz for decades, and never had any dataloss because of it. Honestly, I think your issue is down to operator error, I’m afraid.

      • @RememberTheApollo_
        link
        48 months ago

        In case it isn’t obvious to readers, “tar” is literally shortened from “Tape ARchive”.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          This seems to be correct.

          But a downside of this is that zip archives will be larger, possibly much larger, since there is no compression across files.

          The actual lesson you should have learned was to use backups. If data isn’t backed up then you might as well pretend you don’t have it.

          • @droning_in_my_ears
            link
            18 months ago

            This archive was a backup :/ I was trying to restore the original after making some bad changes.

            The actual actual lesson I should have learned is wait for the full archive backup to extract successfully before deleting the original and declaring the restoration done.

            Still I will always have a (maybe irrational) fear of tar.gz now.