This seems more like a polite “We see what you’re trying to do and in court you may not realize you will not win” than a “pay us now” letter. I’d guess this is more so that the company can show the court they tried to be reasonable. Doesn’t matter either way how the person responds, unless it’s with a payment.
Saying authorities have rejected their defence seems… counterproductive? Their whole argument is that they don’t accept the court’s authority.
Too bad what they accept doesn’t matter.
This seems more like a polite “We see what you’re trying to do and in court you may not realize you will not win” than a “pay us now” letter. I’d guess this is more so that the company can show the court they tried to be reasonable. Doesn’t matter either way how the person responds, unless it’s with a payment.
That letter is from Carvana.
This was satisfying to read, thanks for sharing!
It’s hilarious that companies have dedicated sovcit reply letters.