• @Feathercrown
    link
    English
    148 months ago

    You fall under the former though. Have you actually looked into this at all or do you just feel that fusion is impossible and then bother all of us with that?

    • Philo
      link
      fedilink
      -168 months ago

      Do you think I would say such a thing based on feelings? If so, you are wrong. Fusion isn’t impossible, it happens all the time in stars. It’s the containment that is the problem and at the present that problem is insurmountable. That problem will remain insurmountable for the near future and I would say unless we find a way to contain gravity (as in a star) we are not going to be able to contain fusion on Earth. I do find it surprising just as almost everyone ignored the Hyperloop’s G-force problem and thought it was the next big thing, you guys are doing the same here with fusion.

      • @Feathercrown
        link
        English
        98 months ago

        The g-force problem is unimprovable-- humans themselves have a limit. The containment problem is not.

          • @Feathercrown
            link
            English
            108 months ago

            Perhaps you didn’t understand me. I’m saying there’s a difference between a problem which cannot be reasonably solved (humans can only sustain X amount of g-force) and a problem which is merely difficult (plasma containment).

            • Philo
              link
              fedilink
              -138 months ago

              There is a difference in degree yes. So?, People still ignore them and that is the point.

              • @Feathercrown
                link
                English
                98 months ago

                The containment problem is not being ignored. It’s like the second most worked on part of fusion reactor technology besides power generation.