• @[email protected]OP
    link
    fedilink
    1511 months ago

    Well, if the only thing you need from reflection is the name of a type, so then yes. But I wouldn’t really call this reflection since it is very limited.

    • Ephera
      link
      fedilink
      911 months ago

      Yeah, Rust can’t have proper reflection, since there’s no external runtime environment that keeps track of your state. Any such smartness either has to be compiled-in (which is how std::any and macros work) or you can implement something to keep track of this state at runtime, as if you were partially building a runtime environment.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1211 months ago

        Minor point of clarification: it can’t have runtime reflection, but in principle it could have compile time reflection.

        • @QuaternionsRock
          link
          111 months ago

          And compile-time reflection will probably also continue to suck due to some irreconcilable limitations of type-safe generic specialization. Oh how I would love an equivalent to C++ template parameter packs…

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          011 months ago

          No, the Rust Project recently made sure that Rust can’t have compile-time reflection.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -111 months ago

              Here is a short summary. The compile-time reflection project was stopped, and now nobody wants to touch that subject any more due to fear of getting the wrath of the Rust project again (the person responsible for the whole thing is still part of the leadership).