• Hegar
    link
    fedilink
    99 months ago

    I just can’t agree with this line of reasoning. It’s so close to all the violent white supremacists who whine about how unfair and damaging it is to be called racist.

    Hatred against jews has uniquely strong roots in western cultures that merits a specific term - every right wing conspiracy theory is still just reheated blood libel and protocols of the elders of zion. It’s deserving of a powerfully negative term.

    If your opponent in an argument is antisemitic, you should win. Of course, anti-zionism is not antisemitism and criticism of the state of israel is not antisemitism.

    Misuse of the term is something to be challenged through discourse, rather than scrapping the term, I think.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      49 months ago

      Oh, you are misunderstanding me. Antisemitism is a fine word in itself, what I’m arguing against is not the word antisemite itself. I am arguing against the pointless arguments over what the word means, the “what you really mean” or the “you are using the wrong word because technically it shouldn’t mean what people use it for” arguments.

      And I also think it’s an okay argument to have, if society really has long-held conflicting beliefs over what a word means. Like the word “socialist”. It makes sense to argue over what that means. But trying to redefine “antisemite” as someone who hates Jews and Arabs as well is stupid, since in usage it was specifically used for people hating Jews.

      • Hegar
        link
        fedilink
        59 months ago

        Ah! My apologies.

        the “you are using the wrong word because technically it shouldn’t mean what people use it for” arguments

        Yep, totally agree. It seems like irrelevant trolling at best.