• @Nudding
      link
      -11 year ago

      You would think, based on the name, protect the environment.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        If you’re judging agencies by their names rather than the powers given to them through enacted legislation, I guess I don’t know what to tell you

        • @Nudding
          link
          -11 year ago

          So instead of focusing on giving the EPA more power to do their job, what has he been doing for the past 4 years?

          • @Cryophilia
            link
            41 year ago

            Congress is the one who could restore power to the EPA.

            • @Nudding
              link
              -21 year ago

              Maybe they should start paying attention too?

              • @Cryophilia
                link
                21 year ago

                Maybe they would, if we got enough democrats in office to overrule the regressivist Republicans.

                • @Nudding
                  link
                  01 year ago

                  Maybe isn’t good enough, I’m afraid. Also, aren’t they the majority?

                  • @Cryophilia
                    link
                    11 year ago

                    Dems have a bare sliver of a majority in the Senate, and are in the minority in the House of Representatives.

                    In any case, most legislation requires more than a simple majority. You need a filibuster-proof majority (60 Senators). Anything less that a majority in the house and 60 Senators requires compromise with Republicans, who are famously resistant to any compromise.

                    That’s the end game for people who truly want to see good things in the world. Majority in the House + 60 Senators + President.

            • @Nudding
              link
              11 year ago

              So, not enough. Thanks.