The agreement between the pastor of Dad’s Place and the city of Bryan comes with conditions.

  • FaceDeer
    link
    fedilink
    09 months ago

    The point of things like the fire code is to ensure that if, for example, you’ve got 20 people sleeping in a building the building is set up to be able to get those people out easily if it catches on fire. So it’s not a problem until you’ve got 20 people sleeping in the building. If the building’s only safe for 4 people sleeping in it then there’s no fire code problem if 4 people are sleeping in it. It only becomes a problem when you cram 20 people in there.

    • @Xanis
      link
      89 months ago

      This isn’t the point people were trying to make. It’s the slowly growing frustration that people feel as they hear time and time again how people in power only take notice of someone when they try to help others who need it.

      Amongst other growing social issues, this one is especially obvious in most cases.

      • FaceDeer
        link
        fedilink
        29 months ago

        It’s the point I’m trying to make. The place wasn’t shut down arbitrarily for no reason, it was shut down (or rather prevented from becoming an impromptu homeless shelter) because it wasn’t safe.

        If this had been allowed to carry on without fuss and then there was a fire that killed dozens of homeless people the headlines would have been blaring about how the city was responsible for those deaths. Damned if you do, damned if you don’t.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          19 months ago

          It also wasn’t safe for those homeless people to be sleeping outside in frigid temperatures. When weighing the options, would you rather have them sleep in a heated area that allegedly isn’t safe (though perfectly safe for congregants to congregate during normal hours) or sleep outside where they’ll most likely freeze to death? I don’t thinking people would have such an issue if there were a legitimate alternative available but there wasn’t.

          • FaceDeer
            link
            fedilink
            39 months ago

            There’s a big difference between sleeping in a place overnight and just standing around “congregating” there, from a fire safety standpoint.

            This is not a one-off issue. The place has been repeatedly failing fire inspections. If the guy wants to use it as a homeless shelter then he needs to fix those issues.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Nobody is arguing that the building should remain unsafe. We’re pointing out that the alternative for those who stayed there would likely have been freezing to death sleeping outside. The place didn’t burn down obviously, so it was definitely the right call to have them sleep in the church during the cold snap.

              • FaceDeer
                link
                fedilink
                19 months ago

                They lucked out this time. That’s a lousy basis on which to judge building codes. Every building that burned down and killed dozens in the process spent many days not burning down first.