I hate how weird the focus on arch installation is. I got attacked on reddit for calling endeavour arch. Like, I used that shitty method of installation in 1997, it’s tedious and there are better ways now.
You’re missing the point. Arco, Garuda, and Endeavour are all still Arch. Manjaro might’ve had the same Arch daddy, but then it got repeatedly dropped on its head as a baby and got really “special” along the way.
I use EndeavourOS too. The main reason Endeavour isn’t considered Arch is due to tech support reasons, mainly. Even though it’s using Arch’s repositories, it’s more appropriate to get support from the Endeavour community/developers rather than through the distro it’s based on.
Anyone who says otherwise is just being an elitist. I picked Endeavour since it’s a quicker install process. I’ve installed Arch enough times from distrohopping now. :p
Yeah people definitely go overboard with that. I think the only real problem is that Arch-based distros might be using other repositories and not be completely sync’d with Arch itself so then users will go to Arch support forums or communities with problems that don’t affect vanilla arch. But I’ve never really cared when people using derivatives claim they’re on an Arch system.
Installing isn’t even as big of an undertaking these days too, so it’s less of an achievement then people would like to think. Last time I did a clean install on my laptop I just ran the ‘arch-install’ script included on the vanilla ISO and it was super easy, lets you choose where you want it installed, pick from a list of desktop environments, and you pick between alternatives for other common packages then you’re good to go without having to do much manual work during the install itself.
I hate how weird the focus on arch installation is. I got attacked on reddit for calling endeavour arch. Like, I used that shitty method of installation in 1997, it’s tedious and there are better ways now.
You’re missing the point. Arco, Garuda, and Endeavour are all still Arch. Manjaro might’ve had the same Arch daddy, but then it got repeatedly dropped on its head as a baby and got really “special” along the way.
I use EndeavourOS too. The main reason Endeavour isn’t considered Arch is due to tech support reasons, mainly. Even though it’s using Arch’s repositories, it’s more appropriate to get support from the Endeavour community/developers rather than through the distro it’s based on.
Anyone who says otherwise is just being an elitist. I picked Endeavour since it’s a quicker install process. I’ve installed Arch enough times from distrohopping now. :p
Yeah people definitely go overboard with that. I think the only real problem is that Arch-based distros might be using other repositories and not be completely sync’d with Arch itself so then users will go to Arch support forums or communities with problems that don’t affect vanilla arch. But I’ve never really cared when people using derivatives claim they’re on an Arch system.
Installing isn’t even as big of an undertaking these days too, so it’s less of an achievement then people would like to think. Last time I did a clean install on my laptop I just ran the ‘arch-install’ script included on the vanilla ISO and it was super easy, lets you choose where you want it installed, pick from a list of desktop environments, and you pick between alternatives for other common packages then you’re good to go without having to do much manual work during the install itself.