I don’t mean doctor-making-150k-a-year rich, I mean properly rich with millions to billions of dollars.

I think many will say yes, they can be, though it may be rare. I was tempted to. I thought more about it and I wondered, are you really a good person if you’re hoarding enough money you and your family couldn’t spend in 10 lifetimes?

I thought, if you’re a good person, you wouldn’t be rich. And if you’re properly rich you’re probably not a good person.

I don’t know if it’s fair or naive to say, but that’s what I thought. Whether it’s what I believe requires more thought.

There are a handful of ex-millionaires who are no longer millionaires because they cared for others in a way they couldn’t care for themselves. Only a handful of course, I would say they are good people.

And in order to stay rich, you have to play your role and participate in a society that oppresses the poor which in turn maintains your wealth. Are you really still capable of being a good person?

Very curious about people’s thoughts on this.

  • Ragnell
    link
    fedilink
    181 year ago

    I think if a good person were to amass half a billion dollars they would spent enough of it on charity that they could never become a billionaire. So there are no good billionaires, but perhaps a few good millionaires moving to ex-millionaire.

    • Bipta
      link
      fedilink
      211 year ago

      Moving to ex-millionaire? A million isn’t even enough to retire in the US.

      • Aesthesiaphilia
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        Yeah that math is a little outdated. I think the “you have too much money” range has gone up to around $3-5 million now.

        • Tango
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          I think that’s still far too low. If you own even a moderately successful small-medium sized business then you can get to the point where you have more than that.

          • Aesthesiaphilia
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            In personal wealth? Or does the wealth belong to the business?

            Business investments or cash reserves or whatever are waaay beyond the scope of this discussion. That would have more to do with antitrust law and what a fair C suite compensation is.

            If you started a small business and are wildly successful to the point that you, personally, have $7 million dollars? Then yes, you have too much money.

            It’s not “this is the amount of money a person starting from nothing can achieve”.

            It’s “this is more money than any one person ever needs, regardless of where it came from”.

            • Tango
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              $7 million really isn’t obscene money. If someone has a successful business and retires at 50 years old with $7 million in the bank, assuming they live to 90 that’s only $175k per year. Depending on where you live that can range anywhere from very comfortable to barely getting by. Of course, you could invest it and assuming 4% annual yield that’s $280k per year, which is the right way to do it. I personally have no issue with someone reaping the rewards of their success. I also think that the rich people hate is misplaced. Why are people mad at the wealthy for not picking up the government’s slack, instead of being mad at the government for slacking in the first place?

              • Aesthesiaphilia
                link
                fedilink
                11 year ago

                An aspect of the government not slacking is taxing wealth people and high earners more.

                $280k per year

                More money than any one person needs. Obviously not as obscene as the ultra wealthy, but there’s a cutoff point somewhere in the $150k-200k range where you don’t get any extra happiness out of money, it’s just pure greed amassing more.

                • Tango
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 year ago

                  Tax them how though? Honestly, most billionaires don’t take a massive salary, many of them have an official salary that is wholly unimpressive. I think Bezos’ official salary as CEO of Amazon was under $100k. And I am firmly against the idea of a wealth tax because that means you’re taxing someone on money that they don’t have. If I find a painting at goodwill that turns out to be worth $100 million, should I be expected to pay taxes on that $100 million even though I only make $20/hour? That would be totally unfair, you’d be taxing me on money I don’t have.

                  • Aesthesiaphilia
                    link
                    fedilink
                    11 year ago

                    If I find a painting at goodwill that turns out to be worth $100 million, should I be expected to pay taxes on that $100 million even though I only make $20/hour?

                    Obviously you sell the painting to pay the taxes on it. Then you still have $80 million or whatever. Sounds fair to me.

    • minnieoOP
      link
      fedilink
      6
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      My thoughts as well, pretty much exactly what I meant in my post.

      if you’re a good person, you wouldn’t be rich.

      Hardly any millionaires become ex-millionaires by choice, it’s that difference that can help distinguish the ‘good ones’ from the ‘not good ones’. If they chose that route through donation, charity, whatever it may be, they are good. If it had to be ripped away from them through just natural shitty circumstances, and otherwise would keep being hoarded, not so much.