• FenrirIII
    link
    English
    171 year ago

    You missed the ‘/s’ for sarcasm, didn’t you?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -181 year ago

      It’s absolutely 100% part of the reason why I interpreted it the way it was meant to be interpreted.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -81 year ago

          I cant believe people are actually arguing that the top level poster wasn’t implying that this article is claiming that palworld failing.

          • Pepsi
            link
            fedilink
            31 year ago

            i can’t believe it matters this much to you

              • Pepsi
                link
                fedilink
                4
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                🙄

                Weird to get self-righteous about your inability to understand clear sarcasm

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -61 year ago

                  Again, my response took the sarcasm into account. Its more likely that you don’t understand the sarcasm.

                  • Pepsi
                    link
                    fedilink
                    01 year ago

                    i mean sure, maybe i don’t get it on the level you do. maybe nobody here has such a refined sense of taste in humor as you.

                    but that doesn’t excuse you being a whiny bitch about it.