@[email protected] to Programmer [email protected] • 1 year agoThey had a paid break, right?pawb.socialimagemessage-square57fedilinkarrow-up11.12Karrow-down111
arrow-up11.11Karrow-down1imageThey had a paid break, right?pawb.social@[email protected] to Programmer [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square57fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink17•1 year agoAt least with your assembly code it’ll go brrrrrrrt because of how fast it’ll be.
minus-squareℍ𝕖𝕝𝕝𝕤𝕥𝕠𝕣𝕞𝕪link9•1 year agoI always have problems with assembly. Especially after being at Ikea.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•1 year agoA pal in tech school did code golf in assembly. There are people like that.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink7•1 year agoit reaches ‘t’ from ‘b’ with a lot less iterations of ‘r’. It seems to me that you have a more optimized version. :)
At least with your assembly code it’ll go brrrrrrrt because of how fast it’ll be.
Assuming it actually works
I always have problems with assembly. Especially after being at Ikea.
A pal in tech school did code golf in assembly. There are people like that.
My assembly code only goes brt :(
it reaches ‘t’ from ‘b’ with a lot less iterations of ‘r’. It seems to me that you have a more optimized version. :)
Maybe you switched up
jgandjl?/s