I’m fairly new and don’t 100% understand it yet, but instances are run on servers that require money. Are we heading towards seeing ads or subscriptions to raise funds instead of relying on donations to cover overhead?

Especially with the influx of new users. Hardware upgrades are needed.

  • @hydra
    link
    71 year ago

    Let’s just hope it doesn’t go the way of email, it started the same way: federated service controlled by no one. Nowadays big corporations influence banlists to enforce a protection racket and non-compliant instances are both banned and filled with spambots.

    • PaintedSnail
      link
      131 year ago

      I’ll be honest with you, I would rather have the ban lists than not. No server is required to use them, and the amount of spam and fraud they filter out is enormous. If someone gets on an IP blocklist because they either can’t or don’t know how to secure their system, then no one should trust anything from them. Having a way to identify them before they cause a problem is enormously helpful.

      There is already a project underway to identify federated servers that just spew spam, and I am all for it.

      • @hydra
        link
        3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        No server is required to use them, and the amount of spam and fraud they filter out is enormous.

        Okay you do have a point. The thing is they get abused for email where it’s pretty much a racket. I just really hope Lemmy doesn’t end up the same way, since if some bad faith powerful actor starts having control over a list then they get to dictate which servers can federate and which ones not, which is pretty much a walled garden.

        I do get the need to identify malicious instances preemptively though, spambots are a threat wherever we go and some instances are just insufferable like exploding heads.

      • dazt6h
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        After getting into an IT job and dealing with poorly managed email domains with non existent DNS records. I can completely agree with you, it’s necessary.

      • b3nsn0w
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        what’s the project called? instance admin here, i’ve defederated from a few problem instances i’ve found so far but i just can’t read through all of it

    • @Zippy
      link
      51 year ago

      While correct in that email is definately now limited to a small number of major corporations, the core function has not been monitized. In other words, because I have a Gmail account, I am not limited to Gmail apps nor do they inject advertisement into them. I can live with that.

      • @hydra
        link
        11 year ago

        But is hosting your own mail server and using it for work/finances/everyday life still an option? I don’t think so, at least not without workarounds because sooner or later you will have to send/receive to/from big email.

        • @just_some_guyB
          link
          31 year ago

          I looked into it not too long ago. It’s basically a standard spam protection to block any emails from a private server. Sure Google doesn’t own Email, but any Ody with a Gmail account won’t even get your email in their spam filter, it won’t even make it that far.

          • PaintedSnail
            link
            3
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            As someone who works with small businesses, most of whom run their own internal email server, I completely disagree. Yes, it does take some knowledge of DMARC, DKIM, SPF, and DNS, but any well-managed server would have those set up properly anyway. GMail has no issue accepting email from a correctly set up server.

            AOL servers, on the other hand, are a massive PITA.

    • 👁️👄👁️
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      We are already cut off from big tech social networks, who cares if it were to happen again? It can only make us grow bigger than we are now.