Ukraine has called for frozen Russian assets to be used to rebuild the country’s war-ravaged economy after a report showed the cost of reconstruction increasing to almost $500bn.

In their third assessment of the likely price tag for recovery and reconstruction after Russia’s invasion two years ago, the World Bank, Ukraine’s government, the European Commission and the UN said the war had caused the economy to shrink by more than 25% and had been a “dramatic setback” to Ukraine’s development.

Ukraine’s prime minister, Denys Shmyhal, said: “The needs or reconstruction have continued to grow over the past year. The main resource for Ukraine’s recovery should be the confiscation of Russian assets frozen in the west. We need to start this process already this year.”

An estimated $300bn of Russian assets have been frozen since the war started in February 2022.

Archive

  • Mbourgon everywhere
    link
    English
    159 months ago

    Why? If a criminal torches my house, they have to pay to rebuild it. Why should this be any different?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -139 months ago

      if found guilty, yes - generally people in that situation arent actually paying you back though, that’s why you have homeowners insurance.

      it’s different because it’s not your house, it’s a country.

      • @maness300
        link
        English
        8
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Russia’s aggression has already been deemed illegal by the UN.

          • @NateSwift
            link
            English
            129 months ago

            So they’ve been found guilty? Which was the requirement you made previously for seizing funds

          • @maness300
            link
            English
            99 months ago

            Yes, but its member states are justified in taking action.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        29 months ago

        There is not going to be an infallible higher power coming down and telling us what to do. If we as a collective think Russian assets in EU hands should be used for this purpose, then that is what will happen. It is the EU that will ultimately decide if this is the right course. It looks like the current prevailing opinion is that the money should be used for this, as soon as possible. It is scary to do something that has not been tried before. Let’s hope for the suffering people of Ukraine, our elected officials get to work sooner, rather than later.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        09 months ago

        Your homeowners association subrogates against the destroyer’s insurance if it was an accident and pursues the destroyer themselves it it was intentional. If they can’t pay, they’re bankrupted. The only reason criminals don’t typically pay for the damages is because they tend to be somewhat “judgment-proof,” meaning that they have no assets to be seized nor wages to garnish.

        But we have the seized assets and they’ve been found guilty…