- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
Run, you fucking piece of shit. Go go go gogogogogogog!
My niece told her grandmother about her fear of getting murdered at school. Feel that fear, asshole.
Run, you fucking piece of shit. Go go go gogogogogogog!
My niece told her grandmother about her fear of getting murdered at school. Feel that fear, asshole.
Right, so you think clinically insane people and toddlers should have guns.
I think the only valid point you have is that insane people shouldnt have guns; toddlers parents should be in charge of what they have access to. So if you proposition is that we only limit guns to insane people, I agree to this compromise.
Got it. Parents get to decide whether or not toddlers should have access to drugs.
Strawman
Nope, logical inference based on what you said.
Or does “toddlers parents should be in charge of what they have access to” mean something non-literal? Was it metaphorical? I doubt it.
If you’re going to make sweeping general statements that apply in every situation, that’s not my fault.
Nope, drugs are directly harmful, a child could hold and carry an unloaded weapon with no issue. Or they could shoot a gun that shoots something non lethal.
I said ‘access,’ not ‘use.’ A toddler cannot be harmed by picking up a bag of meth any more than they can be harmed by an unloaded weapon.
So it’s okay to let them do that, right?
Of course they can… Have you not noticed how cops wear gloves when they deal with drugs, the residue on a bag could literally kill someone.
But if your gun control counter negotiation is no toddlers or insane with guns, I will accept that counter offer.
Yes, I have noticed that cops buy into all kinds of propaganda bullshit about drugs.
And apparently so do you.
Cops also pass out when they touch a tiny bit of fentanyl despite fentanyl not being able to be absorbed by the skin that quickly or easily.