• @CrayonRosary
    link
    English
    -1
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Several orders of magnitude smaller than 8,000… So… 0.08 people? I do love your skill with numbers!

    Not many people have replaced cars with e-bikes—yet, so it’s not surprising we don’t see much difference

    Exactly! Then why are you so adamant that it would instantly become worse if they had to drive again? Those 10s of ebike riders who chose not to drive aren’t going to suddenly kill 10s of people when back in cars. Given how many cars there are on the road, and the relatively tiny number of fatalities, the change would be 0.

    I’m with you, fuck cars, but don’t argue with fake stats and severe exaggeration on important issues. It just makes your argument look bad.

    (I don’t recall saying anything that assumed you own an ebike.)

    EDIT: Ohhhh! No, I’m the ebike owner and fuck cars supporter. I was saying that I’m on the side of ebikes, but I didnt like your arguments. I can see now how my words weren’t clear. I edited my original comment to add “I feel like”.

    As an ebike owner and “fuck cars” supporter, [I feel like] your whole comment is nonsense.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      27 months ago

      Oh wow I didn’t realize several was always equal to exactly 5. Learn something new every day. And you again are pedantically assuming that this is meant to be an exact comparison when I literally said I don’t have the numbers—as far as I’ve seen, no one does.

      My point is we’re shutting down a potential solution to pedestrian deaths before we’ve even proven that it’s a problem at all. But I will also say that just because pedestrian deaths are not declining doesn’t prove that e-bikes are not having an impact. Deaths have been rising for a while, perhaps they would have risen faster without e-bikes. Someone needs to do a study on this to find out instead of just panicking and banning everything.

      • @CrayonRosary
        link
        English
        07 months ago

        Several is at least 5. I used the smallest possible value to give you the benefit of the doubt. smh.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          First, that’s just incorrect, but even if it was then your use of it above was equally incorrect. Don’t know what your issue is but this conversation has gone far beyond usefulness.

          • @CrayonRosary
            link
            English
            -17 months ago

            “Just incorrect” unlike literally everything you’ve said in this conversation.