• deweydecibel
    link
    English
    33
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    The problem is the way Maps determines routes makes a lot of assumptions but there’s rarely, if ever, a human to correct it until it gets reported a significant number of times. It also tends to fine-tune the routes based on data from drivers. If enough drivers drive down a road and onto another road with Maps open, Google takes that to mean the road is open and the route connects.

    In these kind of backwater, low population places, there often isn’t enough data. Not enough people driving down these roads with Maps open, and not enough people that encounter a bad route bother to report it to Google. So no human ever corrects it.

    Yet another example of how terrible Google makes its services by refusing to hire humans to manage these things.

    • @LesserAbe
      link
      249 months ago

      Sure there are rough edges, but I’ve got to say Google maps is one of the most valuable tools I use, I used it more days than not, and it’s free. I remember the days of printing out directions from MapQuest or having a whole map of the country you keep in your car. Modern map apps are kind of a miracle.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        79 months ago

        It’s been a good run. Now I’m bound to be influenced by the pay-for-prominence highlighted locations.

        Time to try out some offline FOSS solutions!

    • @someguy3
      link
      7
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      There was a story of a guy whose property had exits on either side. Google/Apple/whatever picked up on his data and everyone started using it like a public thruway. He said he had to put up an earthen berm and wood fence (losing his own access to one side).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      39 months ago

      I know, but being a beta tester for a map sucks, and this road had a ’ dead end’ sign.