• @reddig33
    link
    English
    799 months ago

    TLDR: A glitch on the website showed test numbers. The ones drawn earlier in the week on live tv weren’t the numbers shown on the website for a couple of hours.

    IMHO: Dude’s gonna lose his lawsuit because of the live drawing.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      269 months ago

      Depends on how much the guy did in reasonable expectation of having won.

      Like if he quit his job thinking he could retire it’d be rash but not unreasonable for a lottery winner.

      • @GustavoFring
        link
        English
        29 months ago

        Quitting your job before getting any actual money would be a total Chad move. Now he would have to Larry David his way back in by just showing up back at with like nothing happened.

        • @ABCDE
          link
          English
          29 months ago

          That’s what a lot of people have done. It was also up for three days so it’s not unreasonable.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        99 months ago

        There would be good reason not to do this when testing the backend of a computer system for accuracy.

        That being said, if the display is in test mode there no reason not to set the font to Wingdings. And probably have a big “TEST MODE -NOT OFFICIAL” banner.

        • @ABCDE
          link
          English
          19 months ago

          There’s no reason not to put up the real numbers, least of all for the three days these were up for.

      • @pdxfed
        link
        English
        19 months ago

        “…this new suit, brought by Theo Kostantanopolous…”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      199 months ago

      Last November, the Iowa Lottery posted the wrong Powerball numbers, citing a “human reporting error”. However, the Iowa Lottery said that the temporary winners – people who had the numbers at issue – could keep their prizes, which ranged from $4 to $200.

      I wonder how this precedent is going to be factored into this situation. $4-$200 is much easier to say “just let them have it” than the jackpot

    • @SinningStromgald
      link
      English
      49 months ago

      I don’t think the guy is going to get anything out of suing them either.

    • @ABCDE
      link
      English
      1
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      It wasn’t a glitch, it was them testing the website. It wasn’t hours, it was three days. Did you bother reading the article before making that incorrect tl;dr?

      No, he won’t be losing, it was posted on the office site for an extended period of time.

      https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-68343150