I’m talking about you calling Vox ‘highly biased liberal garbage’ but in this conversation you’ve failed more fact checks than they have in five years.
Now you’re trying to change the topic away from my question.
Why did you call it a DOJ report when it clearly isn’t?
How does the Vox article dispute the DOJ report I cited?
The reason you won’t answer my question isn’t that it’s irrelevant, it’s because you are unable to admit when you’re wrong and are doubling down with your agenda.
I have no issue admitting when I’m wrong. It was a typo and irrelevant. It’s an official government record.
Since you can’t dispute the facts that the fbi knowingly interfered in election, you focus on something irrelevant to draw attention away from the truth. They fbi has interfered with two elections now. That doesn’t bother you ?
James Comey expressed remorse for his handling of the investigation into Clinton’s emails.
I guess they learned from that and didn’t publicize their investigation into the laptop which five years later hasn’t resulted in any charges or convictions.
What do you think the FBI should have done differently?
But you called it a DOJ report.
You linked a press release from Jim Jordan that briefly mentions an attorney with the Department of Justice who sat in the interview of Laura Dehmlow.
Why are you calling it a DOJ report?
Do you dispute the fbi knowingly and willfully interfered in the election ? In the article, what are you disputing?
I’m talking about you calling Vox ‘highly biased liberal garbage’ but in this conversation you’ve failed more fact checks than they have in five years.
Now you’re trying to change the topic away from my question.
Why did you call it a DOJ report when it clearly isn’t?
Your question isn’t relevant. As such I’m ignoring it to keep you focused.
What in the letter to the fbi do you find incorrect? Do you think it’s appropriate for the fbi to interfere in an election with lies?
The reason you won’t answer my question isn’t that it’s irrelevant, it’s because you are unable to admit when you’re wrong and are doubling down with your agenda.
I have no issue admitting when I’m wrong. It was a typo and irrelevant. It’s an official government record.
Since you can’t dispute the facts that the fbi knowingly interfered in election, you focus on something irrelevant to draw attention away from the truth. They fbi has interfered with two elections now. That doesn’t bother you ?
James Comey expressed remorse for his handling of the investigation into Clinton’s emails.
I guess they learned from that and didn’t publicize their investigation into the laptop which five years later hasn’t resulted in any charges or convictions.
What do you think the FBI should have done differently?
Not called it Russian misinformation.
What should they have done?